More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 21.88%
Worth A Look: 21.88%
Average: 21.88%
Pretty Bad25%
Total Crap: 9.38%

2 reviews, 20 user ratings

Libertine, The
[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Mean, drunk, and syphilitic: What's not to like?"
3 stars

John Wilmot, the Earl of Rochester, portrayed with the usual playful dementia by Johnny Depp, speaks directly to the camera in the first scene of "The Libertine." He says that in the story of his life that is about to be presented, "You will not like me." How right he is.

A film with an unlikable protagonist -- and John is a complete rotter, not just a philanderer but an abusive jerk and mean-spirited alcoholic -- has an uphill battle to begin with, and "The Libertine" is saddled with an additional burden: It doesn't have a point, either.

It tells John's story, beginning in 1675 under the jolly reign of good King Charles II (John Malkovich), with a certain sly charm and vulgar whimsy, but with no central purpose. Episodes from John's ribald life are recounted; he eventually catches an especially ugly case of syphilis and almost literally falls apart; he dies. At the end, when he asks us, "Do you like me now?," his tune has changed, and now he seems to hope we do. Yet the film has given us no reason to. We certainly don't feel sorry for a bastard like him, flesh-eating syphilis or not. (This makes two films in a row for Johnny Depp where he reminds us of Michael Jackson.)

John was a real person, a bawdy poet and playwright who was alternately a friend to, and thorn in the side of, King Charles II. Wikipedia tells me he is credited with being the author of the first piece of pornography ever produced on a printing press, which I guess is like being the first person to post dirty pictures on the Internet in that he probably had no idea how well the idea would take off. He ran with a merry crew of debauchers, many of them fellow writers, and was the life of any party, especially if that party had sex and alcohol (and honestly, what good party doesn't?).

All of this is conveyed quite vividly in the film, directed by first-timer Laurence Dunmore from Stephen Jeffreys' play (which Jeffreys himself adapted). John has a wealthy wife, Elizabeth (Rosamund Pike), whom he leaves in the country most of the time so he can cat around London with his many mistresses, misters and whores. He takes an actress named Mrs. Barry (Samantha Morton) under his wing and coaches her to stardom, while also carrying on an intimate personal relationship with her. Who does he get syphilis from? Open the phone book and pick a name at random.

Depp specializes in odd-duck roles, of course, and you can see why he picked this one. The Earl of Rochester is an eccentric bon vivant who eventually becomes pustulant and prone to ineffective bladder control. He's as devil-may-care as Capt. Jack Sparrow, and as licentious as Hunter S. Thompson. That Depp has not played John Wilmot before now is just an accident of fate.

What he can't help is the film's vulgar uselessness. John's character arc is scant and rather precipitously realized (think death-bed conversion), and no one else's persona is given more than a passing glance. Everyone seems to love John Wilmot, but darned if I can figure out why. Maybe they see something I don't, or that the movie fails to show us.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 01/04/06 11:05:00
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Toronto Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Toronto Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

7/06/15 jeanne No, I don't like you now; neither can I hate you. So clever, yet you hurt yourself the most 5 stars
3/04/08 doro1717 Awsome, grose, funny and sad (for his wife) 4 stars
11/04/06 fiddlepig Underrated. Even the smallest roles are performed brilliantly. 5 stars
9/29/06 AnimalFolk Was not disappointed in Depp. Bordering on being one of our greatest actors 4 stars
7/18/06 my name A little slow, but a good story 4 stars
7/15/06 The Grinch Hmm...Can't really suss it out, but there's something there..a very provocative film 4 stars
6/05/06 mary just average 3 stars
3/24/06 ADC Pointless, overbearing, and unwatchable, but well-acted. 2 stars
3/21/06 Wendy Sue worst film i've ever seen, really! 1 stars
3/19/06 GDM TOTAL CRAP 1 stars
3/13/06 KingNeutron Coarse, raunchy; yet artistic and moving. Great role for Depp. 4 stars
3/13/06 traudel Depp is awsome, the film too splintered 4 stars
3/08/06 ALDO I haven't even seen it and I can say for sure that it's for faggots. 1 stars
1/05/06 Elisa G Mmmm! Most entertaining! 4 stars
11/20/05 Ronnie A gritty shocking film with a stunning, commanding performance by Johnny Depp 5 stars
8/23/05 sus I loved it! Depp is amazing in it and all the supporting cast did a great job too!! 5 stars
11/12/04 caz fantastic johnny was amazing 5 stars
11/08/04 welshie Totally rocks 5 stars
10/26/04 Cameron Slick This was extremely tedious, a great disappointment because Depp is so amazing in it. 2 stars
9/19/04 anonymous Amazing, J.Depp's performance is incredibly moving . M.Brando would be in awe and proud 5 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  25-Nov-2005 (R)
  DVD: 04-Jul-2006



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast