More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 2.56%
Worth A Look: 7.69%
Pretty Bad33.33%
Total Crap: 23.08%

3 reviews, 21 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Ride Your Wave by Jay Seaver

Enter the Fat Dragon (2020) by Jay Seaver

Sea Fever by Jay Seaver

Synchronic by Jay Seaver

Downhill by Peter Sobczynski

Man Standing Next, The by Jay Seaver

Dustwalker, The by Jay Seaver

Proxima by Jay Seaver

Mystery of the Night by Jay Seaver

Lodge, The by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

After the Sunset
[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Dear Pierce Brosnan: Go away. Love, Eric. P.S. Take Woody with you."
3 stars

In a perfect world, there would be a place to send actors who have outlived their usefulness, some sort of home or ranch where they could live out their days peacefully without trying to wedge themselves into movies where they don't belong. Pierce Brosnan would live there, and so would Woody Harrelson, and "After the Sunset" wouldn't exist. Ah, what a world that would be.

But in our imperfect world, Brosnan keeps playing the same role, merely changing the character's name from James Bond to Thomas Crown or whatever. He is always smooth and rakish, always well-dressed, always a ladies man of the highest order, and often very boring.

Then there's Harrelson, whose best work has been in sitcoms -- as Woody on "Cheers," of course, but also in his guest stint as Grace's boyfriend on "Will & Grace" a couple years ago -- and seldom in film. He has a dopey, plastic-faced quality to him, with a dumb grin that begs for smacking, and his performances are nearly always one-dimensional.

So here's "After the Sunset," a by-the-numbers jewel-heist caper about a retired thief who comes out of retirement for one last job, and also about the dogged lawman who relentlessly pursues him. I hate to keep harping on this point week after week, but do the people who make movies not realize that most of us have seen movies before and are therefore not impressed when the same formulas keep popping up again and again? Do they think they're being original? Or do they know they're being lazy and simply don't care?

Brosnan is Max Burdett, the world's foremost jewel thief, now retired with his girlfriend and partner Lola (Salma Hayek) on a Caribbean island. The lawman, Stan Lloyd (Harrelson), for whom Max is his Moby Dick, has followed them here because of an interesting fact: A cruise ship housing the enormous Napoleon Diamond (not to be confused with Napoleon Dynamite) will be stopping at this very island soon. Surely a sticky-fingered fellow like Max can't resist a chance at this allegedly un-stealable item, and now Stan can be there to catch him at last.

Max keeps insisting he's retired, though, both to Stan and to Lola. He tells the local kingpin (Don Cheadle) the same thing when said kingpin tries to hire him to steal the diamond. But we know the siren song of thievery will call out to him. The only question is when, and will he get away with it? (So I guess that's two questions, sorry.)

The screenplay, by Paul Zbyszewski and Craig Rosenberg, both novices, is short on originality but occasionally makes up for it with the sort of glib, coy dialogue between adversaries that can make a movie like this fun. Max and Stan are only enemies in philosophy; personally, they really have nothing against each other, and the film occasionally makes good use of that fact, letting them commiserate when their respective girlfriends get mad at them for obsessing over their quarry (Stan's pursuit of Max, Max's pursuit of the diamond). There is potential for good comedy there, exploring the relationship between two men who, were it not for their divergent professions, would probably be drinking buddies.

But the film squanders most of those opportunities, instead giving us shtick like the bit where two men fall asleep on the same bed and wake up cuddling, har har. The director is Brett Ratner, whose excellent work in "Red Dragon" was apparently a fluke, since all of his other films -- "Money Talks," "Rush Hour," "Rush Hour 2" and "The Family Man" -- have been lame-humored misfires. If there's a place for obsolete directors in my perfect world, maybe down the lane from the home for unnecessary actors, then he can go there.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 11/15/04 12:51:21
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

11/22/07 Matt Reasonable fare that earns an extra * by Hayek's boobs threatening to pop out of her dress. 3 stars
2/03/06 Anthony Feor See what happens when you lose the part as James Bond 3 stars
10/20/05 Agent Sands Heist on luxury liner is G-R-E-A-T. Other than that, this movie's shit. 3 stars
7/18/05 kindra Not good, they think women are sex objects, going around with skimpy clothes on, come on 1 stars
4/15/05 shatonjia Ok movie that deserves 2 stars (from hubby) "Salam Hayek is BOOTYLICIOUS. 2 stars
2/25/05 zoe hunter was boring 2 stars
2/12/05 Gabriel Jolivet boring and not interesting. a below-average movie. 2 stars
2/07/05 craig varney they even stole my price of admission 2 stars
2/05/05 Melissa outstanding- loved Pierce, loved the scenery 4 stars
2/04/05 Barbara Long I liked it but then again I love Pierce Brosnan 4 stars
2/04/05 Debbi Kalstein okay for a buddy movie 3 stars
1/16/05 Jitjit Skephzucks Salma Hayek's have her cake and eat it too attitude gets old. 3 stars
12/27/04 Steve Not a high quality film, but kept my interest somehow. 3 stars
11/18/04 william Bad? What, are they like SERIOUS? DId these people even see this movie? 5 stars!!! 5 stars
11/17/04 Taylor Fladgate good lord! horrible 1 stars
11/16/04 Prometheus Entertaining at times in a stupid way. 3 stars
11/16/04 lycan lame 1 stars
11/15/04 noggin_cmu Hayek is hot.....but even she can't make up for terrible writing 2 stars
11/12/04 Don We walked out after 30 minutes - Brutal to watch 2 stars
11/06/04 Ray Pasable 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  12-Nov-2004 (PG-13)
  DVD: 29-Mar-2005



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast