More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 12.77%
Worth A Look: 10.64%
Pretty Bad: 31.91%
Total Crap: 2.13%

5 reviews, 17 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Gemini Man by Jay Seaver

Pain and Glory by Peter Sobczynski

Rusalka (aka The Siren), The by Jay Seaver

Riot Girls by Rob Gonsalves

Crawl by Rob Gonsalves

Wallflower by Rob Gonsalves

Parts You Lose, The by Jay Seaver

Dilili in Paris by Jay Seaver

First Love by Jay Seaver

Dolemite Is My Name by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

Tristan + Isolde
[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"A legend so old, it could only be properly conveyed by James Franco."
3 stars

Purists are already complaining about how the ancient legend of Tristan and Isolde has been mutilated for its new screen adaptation, and of course by "purists" I mean "nerds." I wasn't aware this ancient legend existed until the film's trailer informed me that "before 'Romeo & Juliet' there was 'Tristan & Isolde.'" (Take THAT, Shakespeare! You suck!!)

Still, those nerds have a point. Many elements of the story, set in the Dark Ages in England, have been removed to make it more relatable to a modern audience. The star-crossed lovers don't fall for each other because of a love potion anymore, for example; now it's for the regular old-fashioned reasons, i.e., his angular, brooding face and her pert bosoms. But even among the original elements that remain, much of the drama has been sucked out of them by a tired screenplay and underachieving direction.

It is a time of war and discontent in stinky olde England. Not only are the various tribes -- your Anglos, your Saxons, your Jutes, etc. -- at odds with each other, but those darn Irish keep sailing over to burn down villages and take Britons back as slaves. (Why they think pasty, weak-kneed Brits would be good workers, I don't know. Don't they see Italy just across the way?)

Tristan (James Franco) is a British youth and an excellent military strategist. Orphaned as a child, he has grown up under the care of Lord Marke (Rufus Sewell), the man who would be king if the bickering tribes could ever agree on a unification plan. And Tristan would be his No. 2.

Alas, Tristan is killed in battle and, according to custom, his body is put on a boat and sent floating away. But whoops! One, he's not dead; two, he lands on the Irish coast, where the beautiful Isolde (Sophia Myles), daughter of King Donnchadh (David O'Hara), secretly nurses him back to health and falls in love with him.

(A side note: Do you suppose maybe the reason the Irish hate the English so much is that the English are always sending their corpses to them on boats? I mean, you set a body adrift in the Irish Sea, where do you think it's going to wind up? Singapore?)

Anyway, Tristan and Isolde can't be together, and they realize it, as demonstrated by very obvious dialogue such as, "We both know this can't be. We've known it from the start." (Yawn.) Tristan heads back to England and they vow never to see each other again. But then! Through a very odd bit of strategy by her father, Isolde winds up married to a prominent Briton, and she and Tristan are once again living in proximity to one another. They don't have Motel 6, but they sure have old stone dugouts and abandoned cellars.

Director Kevin Reynolds has made period pieces before, notably "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" and "The Count of Monte Cristo" (and, less notably, "Waterworld"), but I don't recall the past being as murky and overcast as this one. He's directed plenty of fight sequences, too, yet all the action in "Tristan & Isolde" is shot mostly in rapidly cut close-ups, making it chaotic and confusing (not to mention cheap, since you don't actually have to teach any actors how to sword-fight).

More damaging, though, is the general WB-ification of the story, in a screenplay by Dean Georgaris ("Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life"). The pretty young leads, scrubbed fresh and clean in a most anachronistic fashion, exhibit only teen-drama emotions, nothing approaching the real depth hinted at by the story's classic themes. Sophia Myles is just bland, and James Franco's one facial expression is that of someone whose feelings have just been hurt.

There are serious ideas at work here. Greed, jealousy, love, betrayal -- you can make a powerful film out of those raw materials. But in these hands, it's as shallow and glossed-over as Franco's English accent.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 01/13/06 19:29:11
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

10/01/08 Mia Mital One of the best I've ever seen! It had a LotR feel, but less mystical and more hardcore. 5 stars
12/12/06 Angela Saunders Not typically predictable for this type of movie, overall great film! 4 stars
12/11/06 Wendy Straw Loved it...Watched it twice in 2 days 5 stars
12/09/06 varun mishra its fabulous..wot mor 2 has evry nvr lost its rhythm..war n luv 2gthr.. 5 stars
12/08/06 John MacGillivray fine film 4 stars
5/08/06 jeanne Any film that paints Rufus Sewell as the booby prize is demented. The man is smokin' hot! 2 stars
5/05/06 ES Excellent action and great visuals but way too slow and choppy as hell 3 stars
5/01/06 taz awsome film loved the wedding especially. Worth seeing again and the ending was very deep 5 stars
4/23/06 Mase Watchable nothing more, nothing fresh but I enjoyed being taken to this time period. 3 stars
1/23/06 Soha Molina Bad movie 1 stars
1/21/06 John pretty far fetched story 2 stars
1/20/06 Amanda The chemistry and editing could have been better, and Franco added the emotion it lacked. 4 stars
1/19/06 jghfg kkjh 5 stars
1/16/06 Lauren i thought it was wonderful...definately the best love and war story in a while 5 stars
1/16/06 Darcy Koscal A great film...but a really depressing ending!! 4 stars
1/15/06 Perry Mason Much better than I thought it would be. 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  13-Jan-2006 (PG-13)
  DVD: 25-Apr-2006



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast