More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
4.05

Awesome54.26%
Worth A Look: 21.71%
Average: 6.2%
Pretty Bad: 10.08%
Total Crap: 7.75%

10 reviews, 69 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Gemini Man by Jay Seaver

Pain and Glory by Peter Sobczynski

Rusalka (aka The Siren), The by Jay Seaver

Riot Girls by Rob Gonsalves

Crawl by Rob Gonsalves

Wallflower by Rob Gonsalves

Parts You Lose, The by Jay Seaver

Dilili in Paris by Jay Seaver

First Love by Jay Seaver

Dolemite Is My Name by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Children of Men
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Collin Souter

"A very Human project, indeed"
5 stars

A few years ago, I took a class at film school called Visual Analysis. It turned out to be a three hour weekly time-killer in which we studied two films shot-for-shot and studied the techniques the director used to tell a story visually. We’d watch the movie once all the way through, then spend the next several weeks dissecting it in 15-minute increments with the sound turned down. The discussions became quite comical and absurd, but never without merit. After all, that’s what great art should do, right? In case you’re wondering, the two films that semester were Blue Velvet and Rear Window. It wouldn’t surprise me if years from now, Alfonso Cuaron’s Children of Men ended up on such a syllabus.

It’s a film that defies description. It’s futuristic, but in the same way Terry Gilliam’s Brazil is futuristic, in that everything seems to have gone backwards. It’s a thriller, but it has more on its mind than just giving the audience a thrill every fifteen minutes. It’s a drama about a man who lost his passion and zeal in the face of absolute nihilism, but that only undermines the bigger story of what’s at the heart of such a stoic philosophy lurking within the crevices of the dilapidated society in which this film exists. It is a work of poetry in the purest sense, but the poet at work here composes his verses with so much more than just a camera and a few good lines of dialogue.

The movie takes place in England, 2027 and women the world over have become infertile. Nobody knows why and the movie wisely sidesteps trying to explain it. The entire country has been put on lock-down and immigrants get taken away and put in camps. When the youngest man in the world dies, everyone mourns. Everyone, that is, except maybe for Theodore Faron (Clive Owen), who remains haunted by a death in his family from not too long ago. His ex-wife Julian (Julianne Moore), who belongs to a group of revolutionaries, tries to enlist Theodore’s help with something having to do with a group called The Human Project. Because Theodore works as a bureaucrat for an institution that can help out this group, he becomes a natural target of interest.

Theodore reluctantly gets caught up in Julian’s cause, but his priorities shift when the cause becomes clearer and clearer. They have found a pregnant woman named Kee (Claire Hope-Ashitay), perhaps the only pregnant woman alive, who must be taken to the Human Project in secret. If the government finds her, they would likely take the baby away. They enlist the help of an old friend, a hippie in the outskirts of London named Jasper (Michael Caine), who has many resources and knowledge about how to avoid trouble from trigger-happy soldiers and unwanted government officials.

That’s all I really want to say about the storyline, except that it should be noted that animals have no trouble procreating and the movie makes it known in subtle ways (particularly through a reference to a certain Pink Floyd album cover) that they will soon be taking over. In fact, progressive rock becomes a reoccurring motif as radio DJs play old songs from 2003 and Theodore and Jasper get high while listening to Radiohead. It’s just one of the many ways in which the movie perfectly depicts a world that can’t possibly move ahead even though it would like to. It’s a statement on our own culture when you think about it. How many more radio stations that favor ‘80s music do we really need anyway?

But the movie has more on its mind than that and I’ll leave it to you to see the movie first and pick it apart on your own, lest I should give more away than I already have. Cinephiles will have lots to discuss in terms of how Cuaron and his crew shot the film. Cuaron has demonstrated in the past—particularly with Y Tu Mama Tambien—that he knows how to construct a long single-take shot without being obtrusive or a show-off about it. With this film, he becomes an absolute master at it.

Four shots in particular stand out. The first occurs at the very beginning, the second in a car, the third in a dilapidated room where occurs a major turning point and finally a stunning sequence that takes place on the streets and in a building while bullets fly, explosions rock the earth and characters get separated. It remains, quite simply, the most astonishing sequence I’ve seen all year (the shot begins in a tunnel). Miraculously, these shots only jump out if you stop to pay attention to them. They somehow occur subtly and without an ounce of pretentiousness. I walked out wondering “how the hell did they do that?” But I don’t ever, ever want to really know. Why risk ruining it?

Such flourishes with the medium make Cuaron an undisputable talent and one of the true visionaries working in film today. His enthusiasm for filmmaking comes through with every movie he makes, even a lesser effort like Great Expectations. With The Little Princess, he took what could have been a sappy kids movie and turned it into one of the most eloquent and moving films of the 1990s. With Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, he took one of the most beloved franchises in recent memory and rescued it from innocuousness by giving it the edge and the visual look it so desperately needed. With Y Tu Mama Tambien, he took a coming-of-age drama and used it to explore the dichotomies between the rich and the poor in Mexico. With Children of Men, he has created a completely original work that defies convention.

Of course, he doesn’t do it alone. Clive Owen gives such a complex and moving performance that could be the highlight of his career so far. He’s a perfect choice to play a hardened and deceptively empathetic reluctant hero. Theodore’s sadness and interest in this world shows no matter how hard he tries to conceal it. As the pregnant Kee, Claire Hope-Ashitay gives the movie some warmth as well as a sense of humor. Likewise, Michael Caine, with his long hair, slouching body language and wisened face gives a sense of hope and safety, while looking as though he’s been wanting this part for years.

Children of Men does what great movies do. It shows you a world you’ve never seen before while holding a mirror up to the world you know too well. It engages the viewer with characters whom you’d like to know in real life while making you feel involved and compelled by the drama. It’s thrilling, it’s humorous when it needs to be and the payoffs will linger in your memory long after the film has ended. It showcases a director at a peak in his career and actors who work wonders with a flawless screenplay. It’s also a visual wonder that’s worth returning to and studying years down the road. Also, I never thought that one of the very best films of the year would feature Michael Caine playing air guitar. What would they make of that in film school?

link directly to this review at https://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=15254&reviewer=233
originally posted: 12/23/06 14:35:40
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2014 Boston SciFi Film Festival For more in the 2014 Boston Sci-Fi Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

6/24/14 dr.lao I'm just glad I wasn't depressed when I watched it 5 stars
5/26/14 Richard Brandt Cuaron's nervously roaming camera lends credence to this bleak, bleak world 4 stars
11/19/12 Sean Harrison A great beginning and a great ending, terrible otherwise. 2 stars
10/02/10 bored mom This rips off American Cyborg: Steel Warrior, except it won't give you a brain hemorrhage. 3 stars
6/17/09 Bonny Javo An interesting idea about the future reduced to a pretentious and plodding chase venue. 2 stars
4/25/09 TheGoc Dark but spectaular story of our near possible future if we continue in the wrong direction 5 stars
4/03/09 Pete Snot A technical marvel bereft of any intelligence, useful plot or characters you'd care about. 1 stars
4/03/09 Gorgon Zola A movie that makes it a point to be pointless. A partonizing script and no ending. Awful. 1 stars
1/11/09 Sully I still find it tough to understand what those crazy Brits are saying! 4 stars
11/19/08 David Newell Filmview Magazine says that this has the "stupidest title in motion picture history" 1 stars
10/08/08 Shaun Wallner I did'nt get it. Very Confusing. 2 stars
9/21/08 mr.mike It was....fair. 3 stars
5/15/08 PAUL SHORTT SCI-FI FANS WILL FIND THE ENDEAVOR A BIT UNDERWHELMING 1 stars
4/21/08 Vineet Doshi Not exactly superb, but a good movie nonethelss. 4 stars
3/22/08 Matt awesome movie, eerily realistic, 1& 2 star raters-you guys are fuckin retarted 5 stars
1/28/08 R.W.Welch Done with great expertise, tho premise is hard to buy. 4 stars
11/01/07 Wake up, people! This is really, sad.. My first serious movie and liek omg it's liek so 'heavy' and 'deep'. i'm smart now, kthxbye 2 stars
10/24/07 Clarence Anyone who gives this film less than five stars is obviously braindead. 5 stars
10/24/07 William Goss A viscerally impressive rendering of an all-too-feasible future. 5 stars
9/13/07 I-K Visually and stylistically gob-smacking, woven through with references subtle and overt. 5 stars
8/28/07 kris A great film, obviously too smart for many here. 5 stars
8/22/07 Double M Technicaly great but flat characters, uninvolving, not THAT deep; didn't make me care. 3 stars
7/08/07 Tom Servo Finally a serious and deep sci-fi film-people with short attention spans beware 5 stars
7/07/07 K. Sear Meandered aimlessly and gave no incentive to care about the outcome. 1 stars
6/27/07 rw this movie blew. not worth the money to rent it. too many unanswered questions. 1 stars
5/30/07 Piz As you can see you'll either love it or hate it. Engaging movie with a flat ending. 4 stars
5/28/07 mb Dark 4 stars
5/26/07 Dan Pointless and confused. 1 stars
5/14/07 Elisa This film sucked 1 stars
5/07/07 Indrid Cold Yet another film enormously influenced by the cinematography of Saving Private Ryan. 4 stars
5/07/07 Tracey Chambers great movie, enuff said 5 stars
5/06/07 Todd Don't let the name fool you, this movie kicks ass. 5 stars
5/06/07 AJ Muller SciFi yes, but the dramatic weight is what gives this movie its power. Astounding. 5 stars
4/29/07 Geraldine Riveting, indeed. I loved this movie. 5 stars
4/23/07 matthew Uninvolving, terrible performances but good cinematography. Not as good as it thinks it is 3 stars
4/17/07 Stevo UK Its not us and our machines that are damaging the planet, its God-awful films like these. 1 stars
4/17/07 Jefenator Best I've seen in years. Pushes the envellope and doesn't mush out like most thrillers do. 5 stars
4/03/07 Monday Morning Better for humans to disappear, the way we're screwing up the planet. 2 stars
3/29/07 Luke My fave of 06 and well on it's way into my personal top movies of all time "pull my finger" 5 stars
3/28/07 action movie fan potetniaaly good, but way too avant garde-often confusing 3 stars
3/21/07 James Dunn Bleak, yes, but ultimately uplifting speculative fiction. Loved it! 5 stars
2/18/07 dmitry Good for the first hour before devolving into ridiculous schmaltz 2 stars
2/15/07 Bruce H An astounding, amazing, thinking persons movie, with a frighteningly real sequence 5 stars
2/09/07 mckrob definitely worth seeing !! 5 stars
2/05/07 Bert Kaplan lots of violence, great if you love blood and guts; a few interesting ideas 2 stars
1/26/07 kris Bitchflaps: what pretentious or derivative about it? Flap your bitch less. 5 stars
1/22/07 drtednelson the action sequences were almost good enough to make me forget that this movie had no "why" 3 stars
1/20/07 Dan F Background was the new of the world we live in - everyman/woman solidly placed at the core 5 stars
1/18/07 jcjs always nice to see Clive...excellent message which will happen if we don't straighten up... 5 stars
1/17/07 daveyt thought ending should've been darker, excellent film anyway. Will watch again for subplot 5 stars
1/15/07 Ben(jo) de Cinema An accomplishment of craft in every aspect. The ambiguity of its end is necessary to theme 4 stars
1/14/07 Tanya Excellent, full of action makes you think about the future 5 stars
1/14/07 Simon Beautifullly, stunningly, gorgeously directed. Sometimes hollow, but still impressive x10. 5 stars
1/13/07 Bitchflaps Horrendously pretentious, derivative and overlong, I almost walked out. 1 stars
1/11/07 biskitboy Masterful execution of a C-grade script. Half-baked. 4 stars
1/10/07 shaun lawton Nothing silly about it. Gripping, realistic, funny, tragic. Best futurist movie I've seen 5 stars
1/10/07 kris A marvel, should be seen in a good cinema. Saw it 3 times. 5 stars
1/09/07 del You're all just repeating one another because someone told you to. Sheep. 3 stars
1/09/07 Gerhard Maier Amazing movie that proves the genius of Cuaron. Watch it on a big screen 5 stars
1/08/07 Jill A really great story just doesn't end like that, Cuaron didn't have the guts to see it thru 3 stars
1/08/07 Todd Wallace Visionary, excellent film. Masterpiece. Politically relevant to today's war crimes. 5 stars
1/08/07 Zee Ryder See it. Then read the book and see it again. Science is dead, what's left? 5 stars
1/07/07 Christine Loved it. But cried a lot. Disgusted by the similarities to the US(what we're doing now) 5 stars
1/07/07 Jeffrey Fantastic, thought provoking and at times touching 5 stars
1/07/07 Dark Enchantress Great movie, very interesting and i could not look away 5 stars
1/07/07 Geoff Best action sequences I have ever seen in film, the theater I was in gave standing ovation 5 stars
1/06/07 Jeramie Clark Good call on the second viewing, every frame provides more depth to the story..AMAZING 5 stars
12/28/06 Tony Jovevski Magnificent, bravura film making. Best sci-fi in two decades. A privelege to sit and watc 5 stars
12/27/06 Ole Man Bourbon Pretty silly plotline, but an involving, active movie. 4 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  25-Dec-2006 (R)
  DVD: 27-Mar-2007

UK
  22-Sep-2006

Australia
  19-Oct-2006



[trailer] Trailer




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast