More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 13.56%
Worth A Look: 10.17%
Average: 5.08%
Pretty Bad: 22.03%
Total Crap49.15%

5 reviews, 29 user ratings

Latest Reviews

To the Ends of the Earth by Jay Seaver

Wood Job! by Jay Seaver

News of the World by Rob Gonsalves

Promising Young Woman by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Woman 1984 by Rob Gonsalves

Godfather, Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone by Rob Gonsalves

Mank by Rob Gonsalves

Wander Darkly by Rob Gonsalves

Stand In, The by Rob Gonsalves

MLK/FBI by alejandroariera

subscribe to this feed

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, The
[] Buy posters from this movie
by William Goss

"Leatherface, The Dull Blade"
2 stars

The scariest thing about 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning' is just how boring it manages to be, not simply as a generic horror flick, but as the prequel to the remake of a genre landmark. However, it does next to nothing that wasn’t already accomplished to better effect in its 2003 predecessor, let alone that film’s own source. Just because this may the first time audiences have seen a “prehash” like this doesn’t mean that they still haven’t seen it all before.

1969: A rural Texas slaughterhouse shuts down and misunderstood brute Thomas Hewitt/Leatherface (Andrew Bryniarski) doesn’t take too kindly to a pink slip. Later that day, the local law enforcement officer doesn’t take too kindly to a shotgun shell, and Mr. Hewitt decides to become Sheriff Hoyt (R. Lee Ermey) in his stead. Having developed a taste for cannibalism as a Korean POW, Hoyt then ensures his family that they will never starve, and sure enough, who gets waylaid but four young adults: a surefire soldier heading back for another tour (Matthew Bomer) and his girlfriend (Jordana Brewster), and the soldier’s brother (Taylor Handley), intent on absconding to Mexico with his girlfriend (Diora Baird) in an effort to dodge the draft.

Automobile + Biker + Cow = Dinnertime for the Hewitt clan.

The first 25 minutes consists of plenty of war whining and those pesky loud noises intended to substitute for actual scares, while the next 35 minutes have our pending corpses encountering obese hillbillies, elderly urination, and other forms of torture. No self-respecting slasher should be more bore than gore, but sure enough, it is only an hour into the barely-ninety-minute film, soon after the obligatory “RUN, BITCH!” moment, that director Jonathan Liebesman (ugh, Darkness Falls) and writer Sheldon Turner (um, The Longest Yard) see fit to start knocking off the leads, and the resulting momentum gathers from a combination of greater gore and waning patience.

For those so picky, the gooey goodness isn’t all that impressive. Most assaults make for plenty of flailing, yelling, and squirting, all to distract viewers from that fact that the violence skimps on money shots until the climactic confrontations. Tobe Hooper did a lot with a little violence back in 1974, but if you’re going to go with a lot of violence, go all the way, because depravity is in no short supply these days. (Oh, and for future reference: redneck cannibals humming lullabies is more hokey and irritating any more than it ever was creepy. Knock it off.) The gore is lackluster, the pacing languid, and the whole shebang is utterly devoid of a single scene demonstrating effective atmosphere or suspense (then again, we pretty much know who lives and dies before buying a ticket, so why bother?).

The most arguable asset to this film, if anything, is its consistency to its 2003 predecessor, even if only halfheartedly maintained and occasionally wanting. After all, there is no real need – and just about no other way – to tell a recycled story besides the way it always has been. Liebesman apes TCM ’03 helmer Marcus Nispel enough to maintain his slickly dirty direction, although no small thanks is owed to cinematographer Lukas Ettlin (he previously collaborated with Liebesman on straight-to-video semi-sequel Rings, which similarly resembled Gore Verbinski’s preceding work on The Ring; sure enough, Ettlin did not partake in Liebesman’s painful Darkness Falls, so perhaps the reins have been in the wrong hands…).

[Nitpick: the ’03 remake insisted on drastically backlighting the Hewitt abode in every nightly exterior shot to distracting effect. Either Liebesman didn’t notice, couldn’t afford it, or felt that their spotlight had yet to be installed by this point in the TCM timeline. At least he got something right.]

The victims all manage to be unreasonably photogenic nobodies, even when covered in dirt, sweat, and blood, with Brewster being quite possibly the best-looking bad actress in the industry, proving bland even for a scream queen (it doesn’t help that her one defiant dinner table bit is about as feeble as she is). Bryniarski returns to his role as the main maniac with all the subtlety and tact that one expected from a chainsaw-wielding hulk who wears other people’s faces, and it ultimately becomes Ermey’s show as the foul-mouthed father who gets as much time as, if not more than, his boy does. Only half of his crude tirades actually come across as threatening or amusing, but it sure is nice to see him chewing out soldiers again. The Full Metal Jacket redux scenes fare better than a pair of Apocalypse Now references, not to mentioned the subsequent irony when The Doors' “The End” comes to mind.

Oh, right, before I forget: that one part of the title, 'The Beginning.' So far as the origin story goes, we’re offered a lame prologue in which Leatherface’s mother dies whilst giving birth to the legendary psycho on a slaughterhouse floor. From there, it’s just a dimly lit and rather protracted montage of expositional keywords, random squishy matter, and the occasional trickle of blood during the opening credits to pass as the total backstory of one of the genre’s most memorable individuals. The tagline invites audiences to “Witness The Birth of Fear,” but one need not make it to the end of 'The Beginning' to realize that, in this case, fear was stillborn.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 10/06/06 18:52:17
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2006 Fantastic Fest For more in the 2006 Fantastic Fest series, click here.

User Comments

4/02/16 David Hollingsworth Unnecessary gore fest 1 stars
1/25/10 Chad Dillon Cooper A dog from snout to tail. 1 stars
10/14/09 American Slasher Goddess The best sequel and ten times better then the remake 4 stars
1/06/09 FrankNFurter Deeply sadistic,misanthropic celluloid diarrhea.For those that thought Hostel was tame. 1 stars
12/02/07 Bnorm Watch it for the gore; if you expect a story you'll be dissapointed. 4 stars
7/10/07 Total Crap No It wasn't good. It's pathetic and acts on its sole purpose of disturbing viewers. 1 stars
3/20/07 chris f best one yet the reviewers are idiots 5 stars
2/26/07 Mike What did u guys bashing this expect? The crowbar seen was SWEET! except for that girl! lol 5 stars
2/16/07 Indrid Cold Maybe I'm off base, but I thought it was the most intense TCM yet, and I've seen them all. 3 stars
1/21/07 David A. The liberals tried to turn it into an anti-war movie. Dumb. 1 stars
1/17/07 rocky This wasn't clever, was pointlessly brutal, with no redeeming value. TCM 1 & 2 were great. 1 stars
12/13/06 mig Vulgar, Depressing, and worst of all...Boring! 1 stars
12/02/06 cd lame snuff film 1 stars
11/01/06 Ben This TCM was no where near as good as the 2003 release... 3 stars
10/26/06 Hien Gore does not equal horror. Not much of a story. Truly a disappointment more than anything 2 stars
10/21/06 cody a gory and intense movie, with very few scares and shocks, but ok way one hour and 30 min 3 stars
10/20/06 Shiba wat the hell r u guys expecting from this film. ofcourse its going2b horror not romantic! 5 stars
10/20/06 Freddy Krueger Why bash this? Of course it's mostly just gore. What the f*ck did u expect? It's not drama! 5 stars
10/18/06 Fewell The gore was great, just as the remakes, but that is all you get, don't expect to much 4 stars
10/15/06 mr.mike extreme violence , some suspense , ermey is A+ 4 stars
10/14/06 michael 1st was better but this was still pretty good 4 stars
10/13/06 Jessica anyone giving this a bad rating shouldn't be watching horror. this is as good as they get! 5 stars
10/11/06 matthew vandervort fuck my eye socket and shit on my cat. slaughter my nob any day 1 stars
10/10/06 matthew vandervort a missing phantom element im not sure what it was but aside from that GREAT ~ disturbing 5 stars
10/10/06 phil the gore kept it interesting even while the story was unimaginative and illogical 4 stars
10/07/06 Mike Intense, graphic, relentlessly heart-pounding. This is the definition of horror. 5 stars
10/07/06 Pritchett As if the last four TCMs didn't suck enough... 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  06-Oct-2006 (R)
  DVD: 16-Jan-2007



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast