More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 6.58%
Worth A Look: 2.63%
Average: 14.47%
Pretty Bad56.58%
Total Crap: 19.74%

8 reviews, 28 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Lucky Grandma by Jay Seaver

Vast of Night, The by Peter Sobczynski

High Note, The by Peter Sobczynski

Taking of Tiger Mountain, The by Jay Seaver

Trip to Greece, The by Peter Sobczynski

Night God by Jay Seaver

Alice (2019) by Jay Seaver

On a Magical Night (Chambre 212) by Jay Seaver

Driveways by Jay Seaver

Free Country by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Number 23, The
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Rob Gonsalves

"This review is 699 words long. 6+9+9 is...24. Well, crap."
2 stars

Imagine my surprise to learn that 'The Number 23' has nothing, in fact, to do with the number 23.

Like many another “meaningful” numeral, 23 has vexed the insufficiently busy for years; the phenomenon even has a name — the 23 Enigma. While it allowed for a creepy (and sometimes tasteless) marketing campaign by New Line Cinema — everything from Caesar’s stab wounds to your mother-in-law’s birthdate can somehow be traced back to 23 — it doesn’t add up to much in the movie. The film isn’t even finally about one man’s obsession with 23; it’s a generic twist-ending thriller in which the meaning of 23, and all else, recedes into absurdity.

With a director like Joel Schumacher (whose past work, to put it kindly, has gone over the top) and a star like Jim Carrey (ditto), The Number 23 should’ve been a guilty-pleasure thriller whose style is as loopy as its premise (think of Dead Again or Shattered, or much of Brian De Palma’s output). But Schumacher is in his clenched, “realistic” mode here, and Carrey gives a grim, exhausted performance that would better suit a more serious movie. He’s expressive exactly once here, when he tosses a noose onto the floor with a film noir flourish. Unlike Robin Williams, who has been down this look-Ma-I’m-a-psycho road, Carrey’s mind doesn’t seem to be racing; his body is. His manic charge is all physical. His body is his tool, and when he can’t use it (as he did, much more expressively, in his best serious effort, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind) he’s a void.

Carrey is Walter Sparrow, a vaguely depressed animal-control officer. Walter runs across an ominous dog named Ned, who bites him and leads him to a cemetery — to one gravestone in particular. Remember that, because nothing in this sort of movie is random. Neither is the fact that Walter’s wife Agatha (Virginia Madsen) buys him a book called The Number 23, packed with details that seem uncomfortably close to Walter’s life. Purportedly fiction, it’s about a detective named Fingerling, who plays the saxophone and dallies a lot with femmes fatales with names like Fabrizia and Suicide Blonde. (Carrey plays Fingerling in the segments we see from the book, looking like he’s in an In Living Color spoof of film noir.) Walter soon grows obsessed with 23, seeing it or permutations of it everywhere, while stray dogs everywhere presumably frisk about uncaught.

I’ve been as harsh on Joel Schumacher as anyone, but he proved in Phone Booth that he can pull it together and deliver a trim, effective thriller. Then again, Schumacher had a script from old hand Larry Cohen; here he’s got one from first-timer Fernley Phillips, who seems to have sprinkled the 23 Enigma stuff onto a standard-issue psychodrama and not bothered to tie it all together. Schumacher’s work here seems dispirited and sour when it isn’t simply bland, and for once in my life I yearned for the madcap Schumacher of those awful Batman films, which at least came off as though the director was having fun (even if we weren’t). And if you’re not going to have fun making, or watching, a thriller, what’s the point?

Everything in The Number 23 is locked — mathematically, you could say — into the big reveal at the end. Since there aren’t many places for this sort of thriller to go, you guess where it’s going pretty easily. And it’s a big letdown after the first half, which promises a dark portrait of a man who gets numerologically in over his head. 23 is treated here as if it were a mental virus, infecting everyone who hears about it and making them run around in vicious circles. But really it has no relevance to the Thing That’s Being Hidden, which has more to do with garden-variety jealousy and the idiocy of someone discovering a bloody corpse and picking up a bloody knife. Then there’s that damn dog Ned, who keeps turning up, and a skeleton discovered in a park, and a scene where Walter mails 23 empty boxes.

This movie is insane, and deserved an insane approach. What it gets is a director and cast treating it with ridiculous sincerity.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 02/26/07 09:24:45
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

8/31/17 brian My street address has 23 characters. So? 2 stars
10/18/09 Matt You can't take Jim from Ace Ventura's comedy to this complete garbage ! I mean WTF... 1 stars
2/10/09 Peter North this movie sucks donkey ass - ha, 23 letters... 1 stars
10/19/08 Samantha Pruitt Jim Carey does a good job but the story is lame! 3 stars
7/19/08 Shaun Wallner A different side of Jim Carrey. 3 stars
6/12/08 DK Over stylised and pappy thriller. Carrey's not bad though 2 stars
1/27/08 mr.mike Sorry , Jim and Joel but it was.....not good. 2 stars
9/17/07 K. Sear Typical pseudo-original crap. 1 stars
8/30/07 Indrid Cold Silly and predictable, but mostly solid. Not sure why it got such horrendous reviews. 3 stars
8/12/07 tejdipty a mind blowing movie grt direction n makin n suspence! 5 stars
8/01/07 Ron just shows, Jim carey should stick to comedy 2 stars
7/28/07 fools♫gold Definitely something average here; I wish I gave "The Tenant" a 2/5. But really, it's nice. 3 stars
4/27/07 Marcus The opening credits are great and after that its all downhill 1 stars
4/18/07 Lindz It was the best movie ever! I loved it! 5 stars
4/05/07 William Goss Fascinating, if only to see how deep they'll dig a hole they can't escape from. 2 stars
3/31/07 Mike Perhaps the dumbest move ever. Incredibly ridiculous. Left very disappointed. 2hrs of pain! 1 stars
3/28/07 Amanda i think this was a great movie! from beginning to the end! 5 stars
3/14/07 Logan Carrey serious? QUE BUENO! 5 stars
3/11/07 Alice SUCKS BIGTIME 1 stars
3/09/07 Tvel Great! The #23 has signigicance to the ending some critics missed it 5 stars
3/06/07 Ole Man Bourbon Pretty decent, til the end. Carey's performance was up and down, all over the place. 3 stars
2/28/07 Jennifer Spry Jim, what were you thinking? This certainly won't get you an Oscar nod! 2 stars
2/26/07 Donny M I thought it was original. Entertaining 4 stars
2/26/07 Felix This one might have been inspired by the very good (german) movie "23" from 1998. 2 stars
2/26/07 psycho you suck 1 stars
2/25/07 Sammeh It's a pretty decent movie. It feels pretty slow and drags out some, but its worth seeing 4 stars
2/24/07 Mere Great opening credits...downhill from there. 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  23-Feb-2007 (R)
  DVD: 24-Jul-2007

  23-Feb-2007 (15)
  DVD: 23-Jul-2007

  25-Apr-2007 (MA)

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast