More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 13.21%
Worth A Look: 5.66%
Average: 9.43%
Pretty Bad37.74%
Total Crap: 33.96%

4 reviews, 29 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Secret Garden, The (2020) by Peter Sobczynski

Star Wars Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker by Jay Seaver

Force of Nature by Rob Gonsalves

Greyhound by Rob Gonsalves

Undercover Vice: Strapped for Danger Part II by Rob Gonsalves

Painted Bird, The by Rob Gonsalves

Relativity by Jay Seaver

Amulet by Jay Seaver

Secret, The: Dare to Dream by Peter Sobczynski

She Dies Tomorrow by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

Saw IV
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Rob Gonsalves

"Wait, what?"
1 stars

"Saw IV" would possibly only make sense if you watched it a number of times, but good luck getting through it even once. Every little bit of dialogue, every event, and probably every sniffle and cough point to the big reveal at the end. Up until then, it's all gory, murky incomprehensibility, in which the moralistic psycho-genius John Kramer (Tobin Bell), or Jigsaw, continues to pull people's strings long after he's dead.

The movie attempts to give Jigsaw more of a backstory: he was married once, to a younger woman (Betsy Russell) who was carrying his child, and ... Well, it ended badly, and then ol' Jigsaw got hit with the cancer stick and smashed up his car, and after that triple whammy he undertook his life's work (or his what's-left-of-his-life's work) teaching people the hard way to appreciate life. In Saw IV, the focus of his attention is on a cop (Lyriq Bent) so driven to Protect the Innocent that he neglects his wife. Ooh, a parallel! Jigsaw neglected his wife, too. In Saw III, whose plot as it turns out unfolds concurrently with Saw IV, the message was to let go of vengeful rage; here it's to let go of the need to save everyone. In Saw V, will Jigsaw go after the executives of Lions Gate and persuade them via Rube Goldberg torture devices to let go of their lucrative Saw Halloween franchise? Or will he go after horror fans who can't get enough of these annual Mikado charnel-house ripoffs?

Of course not. Instead, he goes after rapists and wife-beaters and junkies. For his other trick, he traps people into helping him out either that, or he manipulates his victims into seeing his side of things. Once the Saw series is completely done, sometime in 2029 when Tobin Bell's grandson is playing Jigsaw, someone will probably write a lengthy thesis on Jigsaw and his contradictory, hypocritical methods and philosophy. Jigsaw would rather not just kill you; he wants you to come out of the experience a nobler, stronger (if, sometimes, horribly disfigured) person, having learned a brutal lesson.

In truth, Jigsaw is an interesting character with an interesting worldview and an interesting way of carrying out his will. It's too bad the movies themselves aren't worthy of him. For one thing, they're too grim, and too self-satisfied in their grimness; there's scarcely a spot of levity in any of the Saw films, and the people who must negotiate Jigsaw's deathtraps are barely sketched in. The cop, for instance, is allowed no personality whatsoever beyond sweaty desperation, and in that respect he's no different from anyone else who has danced Jigsaw's macabre dance. For another, director Darren Lynn Bousman has his one trick and humps it to death: the helpless victim is given his/her ghastly choice, and there are approximately 407 whirling quick-cut shots of his/her screaming face from every possible angle. By now, the style and the premise are so rote and tedious that the Saw series has gone far past self-parody into dull convention, like every other horror series that should've died after the first two.

Still, I'm aware that for young horror fans, these movies are what the "Friday the 13th" and "Nightmare on Elm Street" series were to my generation. You don't go for complexity or wit or even good filmmaking; you go to see Jason killing horny teenagers, or Freddy killing horny teenagers in their dreams, or Jigsaw doing his diabolical-puppetmaster number. It could just be nostalgia, but it seems to me that soulless assembly-line horror somehow had more soul back then, y'know?

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 10/16/08 12:05:35
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/25/17 morris campbell not bad better than 3 3 stars
3/25/13 E.C.D. Series should've stopped at 3. From here on, they're the same thing over & over again. D 2 stars
9/02/12 roscoe jigsaw died in the last one, so there was no reason to make anymore 2 stars
3/03/10 Stanley Thai Easily the best sequel in the franchise. 4 stars
3/23/09 mr.mike It should please hard-core Sawheads - but only them. 3 stars
10/28/08 Sugarfoot Completely routine, boring and pointless. The blade has gone dull. 2 stars
10/17/08 tiffany pettey these are horrible. they should have stopped at 2 2 stars
7/23/08 David V At this rate we'll see "Jigsaw Goes to Hell" within the next 5 years. 1 stars
3/27/08 Jack Sommersby Grotesque simply for grotesque's sake. Creatively bankrupt and just flat-out boring. 1 stars
2/16/08 Mike Regurgitated movie from the other "SAW" movies. 2 stars
11/18/07 marina Amazing! like the others 5 stars
11/12/07 beau i didnt understand, it was confusing, just filled with anonymous torture scenes 2 stars
11/12/07 TS I didn't get it - please explain - point to a website which explans it please 2 stars
11/05/07 JohnKramer Obviously this guy didn't understand absolutely nothing, 3&4 are parallels, simply perfect! 5 stars
11/01/07 Rich hard to keep up with the characters. Wish they hadn't killed off Jigsaw 4 stars
10/31/07 Reign This entire review boils down to "I didn't get it, so it sucks" 5 stars
10/30/07 Kathie I thought it was brilliant. I would definitely pay to see it again. 5 stars
10/30/07 Ole Man Bourbon Convoluted crap. 2 stars
10/29/07 mike tried to be too clever and made it a mess. traps not as cool saw saw 3. better than saw 1&2 3 stars
10/29/07 Mike R. huge fan, love the saw thrillogy, hope the turn out to be a series like jason and freddy 5 stars
10/28/07 Brian Mckay didn't see 2 or 3 and had no clue WTF was happening - but it was better than the original 3 stars
10/28/07 Ozboy Film critics show time & again that they let their feelings rule their reviews.Clever movie 3 stars
10/28/07 Naurto Eli Roth licks hairy, sweaty, feces-encrusted monkey balls. 5 stars
10/28/07 Brock If you truly understand the storyline of the series, you'll like Saw IV. 4 stars
10/27/07 JT You all obviously dont understand the parallel of 3 & 4. This movie was great 5 stars
10/27/07 Shawn Eli Roth did not direct this. 1 stars
10/26/07 MickT The 1st,2nd,3rd number 4 is the worst of the worst!! 1 stars
10/26/07 Josh Russell got cast b/c Eli Roth = horror dork who casts washed up actors as "homage". Sucks! 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  26-Oct-2007 (R)
  DVD: 22-Jan-2008



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast