More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 7.69%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average: 11.54%
Pretty Bad42.31%
Total Crap: 38.46%

2 reviews, 14 user ratings

Latest Reviews

To the Ends of the Earth by Jay Seaver

Wood Job! by Jay Seaver

News of the World by Rob Gonsalves

Promising Young Woman by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Woman 1984 by Rob Gonsalves

Godfather, Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone by Rob Gonsalves

Mank by Rob Gonsalves

Wander Darkly by Rob Gonsalves

Stand In, The by Rob Gonsalves

MLK/FBI by alejandroariera

subscribe to this feed

Shutter (2008)
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Lybarger

"Take this one back to the lab."
1 stars

‘Shutter’ is a movie that’s a few years behind its time, maybe even a few decades.

If the Japanese horror classics “Ringu” and “Ju-On: The Grudge” and their English-language remakes hadn’t already been released, “Shutter” wouldn’t have seemed so routine. As it stands, “Shutter” is a sad reminder that both the ideas and the craft of filmmaking have moved on.

It was risky for writer Luke Dawson and Japanese director Masayuki Ochiai to reconfigure a 2004 Thai hit that’s already been reworked by Bollywood. It’s an even dicier prospect if you film the remake in Tokyo with an English-speaking cast.

A pair of newlyweds from Brooklyn named Benjamin and Jane Shaw (Joshua Jackson and Australian actress Rachel Taylor, “Transformers”) have just moved to Japan so that Ben can pursue his photography career.

Before the two can enjoy their honeymoon, Jane hits a glassy-eyed pedestrian (Megumi Okina, “Ju-On”) as she’s trying to find her way to their hotel. It’s hard to tell if the event even happened because there’s no body, and the victim Jane thinks she saw wasn’t dressed for strolling in the snow.

The two try to get used to their new surroundings, but Ben’s photos keep showing weird splotches that look as if he scratched the negative or gave his pictures a strange form of red-eye. Jane instantly recognizes the blurs as the woman from the highway, and she and Ben continue to see her apparition everywhere they go.

All of this might be scary if Ochiai had a wider arsenal of shocks to choose from. After a while, it actually starts to get funny whenever Ochiai amplifies mundane sounds like a creaking door or hair brushing in an attempt to jolt viewers.

The gore and makeup effects are curiously pedestrian. In addition to recycling images from “Poltergeist” and J-Horror film, the blood and goo aren’t terribly convincing, much less creepy.

The spirit photography lore that’s supposed to provide the backbone of the story is too undercooked to be involving. Most of the spirit photos in the past were accomplished through simple double exposures. There’s no great mystery in that.

It also doesn’t help that Dawson and Ochiai are a little behind current trends in photography. Polaroid instant pictures are all but dead these days, and it’s hard to imagine a modeling shoot that would be derailed by a few smudged exposures. Haven’t these folks heard of PhotoShop or digital cameras?

Dawson’s dialog sounds as if he’s taking ideas that sounded OK in one language but resonate poorly in English. Listening to Taylor attempt to tell off a malignant spirit is funnier than anything in “Drillbit Taylor.”

The Japanese setting also proves problematic. Ben has a detailed back story in the Land of the Rising Sun, but Jane only learns of it once she’s there, too. How did these two fall in love when they’ve had so little time together and when Jackson and Taylor have so little chemistry? To Taylor’s credit, she does at least sound convincing as a Yank.

If you want to see an effective horror film, it might not hurt to get comfortable reading subtitles. When interesting Asian films get Anglicized, they often lose the cultural roots that made their stories scary to begin with. There’s little sense shelling out $11 dollars to see a crummy remake in the theater when the original is easily available on Netflix.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 03/21/08 21:00:00
[printer] printer-friendly format  
Horror Remakes: For more in the Horror Remakes series, click here.

User Comments

8/28/11 gosh just horrible..........nothin more to say 1 stars
11/06/10 Josie Cotton is a goddess Stick with the first one. 2 stars
3/17/09 Peter North no boner salute. Joshua Jackson is a worse actor than Ben Affleck!! 1 stars
6/07/08 Priscilla Postlethwaite Recycled plot; predictable ending SO irksome. Are pleasant surprisesCOMPLETELYout of style? 2 stars
6/05/08 Jayson Did we even need this remake? 2 stars
5/12/08 kris mediocre to rubbish. rental at best. 3 stars
4/04/08 Colleen Cousineau This kind of reminded me of The Ring and the Grudge. Good movies. 5 stars
3/28/08 dc shuck nothing great 2 stars
3/28/08 EY The original version is surely better 3 stars
3/26/08 mycuh First the Ring.. then the Grudge.. then The Eye.. NOW THIS... [couldn't stop laughing] 2 stars
3/24/08 Beetrice Best in the west 5 stars
3/24/08 Steve Miller I was moderately entertained. 3 stars
3/22/08 steve owen STOOOPPPPPP!!!! the asian remakes 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  21-Mar-2008 (PG-13)



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast