More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 18.18%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average: 0%
Pretty Bad: 0%
Total Crap81.82%

1 review, 5 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Homewrecker (2019) by Jay Seaver

Gemini Man by Jay Seaver

Pain and Glory by Peter Sobczynski

Rusalka (aka The Siren), The by Jay Seaver

Riot Girls by Rob Gonsalves

Crawl by Rob Gonsalves

Wallflower by Rob Gonsalves

Parts You Lose, The by Jay Seaver

Dilili in Paris by Jay Seaver

First Love by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

One, Two, Many
[] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"The hero of the stupid makes a movie"
1 stars

I’ve seen plenty of vanity projects in my day, but not a single one has made me wince quite like John Melendez’s “One, Two, Many.” The former Howard Stern crony (known to millions as the belligerent knucklehead “Stuttering John”) turned current “Tonight Show” announcer has dreamed up a comedic fantasy for himself where he’s allowed to make out with lovely actresses and claim all the punchlines. Perhaps more of that precious energy should’ve been devoted to a passable screenplay and serviceable direction.

A struggling actor, Thomas (John Melendez) is stuck in a series of humiliating gigs, hoping for his shot at the big time. His love life is in equal disrepair, if only because Thomas is looking for the one woman who will grant him his fantasy of a ménage a trois. Finding the New York single scene unhelpful, Thomas meets his match in Jennifer (Bellamy Young, the film’s lone candle of appeal), the lone woman actually open to making Thomas’s dreams come true. Together they meet Darla (Hudson Leick), a lesbian who wants a crack at Jennifer for herself. Now, having finally achieved his dream, Thomas must deal with the fallout, putting his relationship with Jennifer to the ultimate test.

I’m sure John Melendez is a nice enough guy, but did he really think people were interested him as an actor? “Many” is a disquieting testament to Melendez’s massive ego, for he not only acts, but scripts, produces, executive produces, and writes/performs about half of the soundtrack. Impressive feats, until you find out just how dreadful “Many” is.

It’s telling that National Lampoon ultimately picked up “Many” for distribution, because it falls perfectly in line with the garbage they’ve been releasing for decades now. The short answer is that “Many” is atrociously unfunny and Melendez reveals himself to be a man of zero charisma and artistic capability; however, there’s so much more awful to pore over when watching “Many,” it’s like a drinking game waiting to happen. “Take a shot when Melendez shows no capacity for acting whatsoever.”

The director here is actor Michael DeLorenzo (“New York Undercover”), and I use the term “director” ironically, since there’s nothing in this film actually being led. Essentially a vessel for Melendez to remind the world how hilarious he thinks he is, DeLorenzo’s sole job appears to be making sure the camera is in focus. Even that is a challenge during the film. Why Melendez didn’t direct the picture himself is mystery, since the movie is a love letter to his talents (or lack thereof). Perhaps blocking a scene while also having to dream up new ways to mug shamelessly for the camera would’ve been too much for Melendez to juggle.

The pain starts with opening titles no more impressive than the introduction to grandma’s vacation video and extends to: Thomas calling his genitalia a “vagining rod,” an unintentionally hilarious sequence where Thomas defends the local stutterer from bullies, an embarrassing cameo from Mark Cuban, the use of what looks like “Tonight Show” offices to sub for apartment and hotel hallways, and an extended straining-on-toilet diarrhea gag that accurately sums up both John Melendez’s talents and the film’s vast ambitions.

In fact, “Many” is packed with unimaginative, juvenile humor that goes against the “Tonight Show’s” core audience of retirement community residents and prison inmates. “Many” is pointlessly crude; Melendez has no actual perceivable wit, so he uses fecal jokes and sexual come-ons to cover the script’s dead spots. It’s a curious choice because the screenplay eventually attempts to provoke sympathy, leaving the weird vulgarity up there with other unexplained touches like: the brief use of animation to embellish Thomas’s fantasy world, why Melendez thought anyone would want to watch a film where he’s cast as an object of sexual desire, and why his character wears a strange, unexplained frizzy wig.

What really irritated me about “Many” wasn’t the rampant stupidity and laziness of the endeavor; with Melendez’s participation, that was to be expected. Rather, it’s how the film wants the audience to care about these characters in the final reel. It’s screenwriting 101 at its most obvious. After 70 minutes of sex jokes, lousy (if present at all) production values, and a moment where Thomas wipes his rear with money after a potent bathroom engagement, I think it’s insulting to ask the viewer to give a damn about the psychological damage inflicted on these idiot characters. But then again, this is a film that believes seeing John Melendez naked is a concentrated strike of hilarity, so clearly “One, Two, Many” was doomed from the start.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 04/18/08 16:34:57
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

4/24/08 el guapo how can you respect a reviewer who says that the hero of the stupid makes a movie? 5 stars
4/24/08 todd I want my money back, this movie is probably the worst i movie i have ever seen, period! 1 stars
4/24/08 jacksonblue So bad I didn't even finish the whole thing. 1 stars
4/24/08 Sconce German Total shit, avoid like the plague 1 stars
4/22/08 inigo montoya this film is great don't listen to this nudnick 5 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  N/A (R)
  DVD: 15-Apr-2008



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast