More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 1.37%
Worth A Look: 9.59%
Average: 10.96%
Pretty Bad: 36.99%
Total Crap41.1%

6 reviews, 37 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Lucky Grandma by Jay Seaver

Vast of Night, The by Peter Sobczynski

High Note, The by Peter Sobczynski

Taking of Tiger Mountain, The by Jay Seaver

Trip to Greece, The by Peter Sobczynski

Night God by Jay Seaver

Alice (2019) by Jay Seaver

On a Magical Night (Chambre 212) by Jay Seaver

Driveways by Jay Seaver

Free Country by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Nightmare on Elm Street, A (2010)
[] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"Freddy's back, sans Fat Boys"
2 stars

Last year, Michael Bay’s remake factory Platinum Dunes churned out a “Friday the 13th” reboot. While far from an inspiring slasher success, the update didn’t outright offend, especially with a franchise that’s already done a masterful job rendering itself hopeless. “A Nightmare on Elm Street” is a different story, as most (myself included) consider the 1984 original to be not only a horror classic, but also an imaginatively molded tale of lo-fi suspense. Again, the sequels have effectively torn away much of the original’s allure, but Wes Craven struck gold 26 years ago with a unique genre idea, making a potential remake seem like an exceptionally pointless endeavor.

Something is killing the teenagers of a small Illinois town; something that only appears during their sleep. For Nancy (Rooney Mara), the images in her head point to a burnt man with a razor glove named Freddy Krueger (Jackie Earle Haley), an unstoppable killer who prowls the playground of the mind looking for specific victims to taunt and dice – a group connected to the quippy madman in some mysterious way. While the local parents (Connie Britton, Clancy Brown) appear to be hiding clues to Freddy’s true identity, Nancy and pal Quentin (Kyle Gallner) strike off on their own, desperate to stay awake while they hunt for the reason Freddy’s after them.

They’ve done it to “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre,” “The Amityville Horror,” and “The Hitcher,” so why not “A Nightmare on Elm Street?” Unfortunately, it’s a franchise that won’t take to a reboot easily, with much of the appeal of the original film rooted in its 1980s identity, from the apple-cheeked virginal valor of the lead characters to the satiric safety of the suburban setting, a safe haven Freddy penetrated with glee. This is 2010. Cheerful, awkward teens won’t do.

The new “Nightmare” is an enormously joyless affair, launching right out of the gate with an oppressive feel that never dissipates. Director Samuel Bayer (a music video legend) seems to think the best way to strike out on his own with this iconic material is to play it emo, with a cast of fashion models sulking around the frame, which scrubs away the needed adolescent panic that makes Freddy’s reign of terror all the more frenzied. This is dour film, hastily sprinting into conflict, making absolutely no effort to develop the community or the characters. Bayer just wants a pretty picture with pretty actors, plunging the audience into violent dreamscapes without even so much as a hello. Nancy who? Freddy did what? What’s the razor glove about? These kids have parents? Bayer’s more interested in the lighting design than he is winding a dazzling tale of mental invasion and teen paranoia.

To be fair to the picture, it’s not explicitly a remake. More than a few moments from Craven’s film are shamelessly reheated, most with not-so-special effects, but the thrust of what little story there is here veers away from the original script. The 2010 film openly questions Freddy’s guilt and sticks with the kids, portraying the adult characters as possibly villainous rather than manically overprotective. The magic of the 1984 picture was Freddy’s monster status and how that hysteria fed into the neighborhood mood of confusion and disbelief. The 2010 picture shows no interest in developing the curse of Freddy, only the splattery gore shots he brings. It leads to the ultimate point about this remake: if you’re a fan of the ’84 “Nightmare,” you’ll telegraph every last scare. If you’re new to this whole Freddy business, you’re seeing an inferior version of the tale.

Bayer makes it impossible to care about any of these kids, with heroine Nancy positively getting the shaft in terms of characterization and performance. Mara is simply awful, mumbling her lines to an infuriating degree, making Nancy into a mopey wuss instead of the more enlightened dream hunter actress Heather Langenkamp was gifted in 1984. Mara conjures no sense of personality or bewilderment, she just stares blankly at her equally monotonous co-stars.

As the scarred prince of sleepytown, Haley is a disappointment, buried under layers of mediocre burn-victim makeup, fitted for an absurdly overcranked horror voice that barely stays in sync with his lips. Short and twitchy, Haley isn’t a menace, he’s a sideshow, making one long for Robert England’s more demented pass at Freddy’s homicidal delight. And don’t let any pre-release promotional talk fool you: Freddy returns to full one-liner mode here, denting the brooding spirit Bayer is hunting for. The jokes are more painful than the slashings and retain little value in a feeble script that can barely decipher its dark side.

While Craven embraced the surrealism of dreams, Bayer is caught between homage and inertia. The new “Nightmare on Elm Street” aims to be a penetrating, atmospheric horror rebirth, but the only thing truly terrifying about the production is how much they spoil what worked so wonderfully and effortlessly decades ago.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 05/01/10 02:18:32
[printer] printer-friendly format  
Horror Remakes: For more in the Horror Remakes series, click here.

User Comments

11/01/19 kevin day A literal re-make with all the iconic scenes from the original being recognizable but "on s 4 stars
2/13/17 morris campbell STILL CRAP AVOID IT IM A OLDSCHOOLER 2 1 stars
10/30/16 morris campbell pointless trashy remake art u knock night of the living dead but praise this trash nothing 1 stars
5/22/15 David Hollingsworth Bay ruins yet again, the essence of another classic 1 stars
1/15/15 the truth An exercise in futile redundancy... minus a nose U_U 1 stars
11/21/11 cr a ok remake with some scares, gOod characters, cool effects, not for fans of org series. 2 stars
8/08/11 Chris F Very average could never have beaten the original 3 stars
8/07/11 art I TAKE IT BACK FOLK"S!,ROBERT ENGLUND is the only one you can play FRED KRUEGER! 3 stars
6/02/11 Chris White One of the worst remakes ever put out period. Complete trash. 1 stars
5/30/11 art I"M AN old SCHOOLER saw the 1984 original,BUT THIS NEW one is SUPER! 4 stars
5/23/11 Ming Wonderful remake..Scarely and fun to watch 4 stars
5/23/11 Braddock Pointless remake to a classic 1 stars
4/17/11 art WONDERFUL REBOOT!,FRED KRUGER would BEAT the TAR out of jason and micheal myers! 5 stars
1/30/11 Charles Tatum Haley's good, but the film is grimy and suspenseless 2 stars
1/27/11 Danny Just OK - average 3 stars
11/17/10 Jerome Cook Anyone who saw this as a kid is OLD! This movie is for your kids! now go die! 4 stars
11/10/10 mr.mike It was OK to watch on Netflix, but hardly earth shattering. 3 stars
10/27/10 gc Freddy is a child molester now?Another pointless re-make.Rent the original instead 2 stars
10/12/10 Robert Smith Very excited, but heck, even my fourteen year old fell asleep, surround sound and all! 2 stars
7/06/10 Realer Killer For the record, the "Stretch Armstrong Freddy" scene of the original is pathetic. Nice try. 3 stars
6/08/10 David Hollingsworth Stick to the original. 2 stars
5/16/10 M coulda been so much betta!! 3 stars
5/15/10 SPiritSLASHer HOLY CRAP, no really, this movie was crap, 1984 Freddy still the best! 1 stars
5/15/10 Alex Thorne Poor. Lacking all sense of tension, horror, and shame. JEH is the sole saving grace 2 stars
5/13/10 DK Nobody wanted it, and it offers nothing new. Unfortunate debut for the talented Sam Bayer 2 stars
5/13/10 damalc a good blend of originality and faithfulness to the original 3 stars
5/10/10 skrew32 Horrible portraying fred as a perv and not a killer if you liked this you cant be over 12 1 stars
5/10/10 Brettski This movie was garbage! What was up with the new Nancy? She was ugly and had a lisp? 1 stars
5/09/10 Pokejedservo Uneven but I did like the acting, I can stand this and I normally don't like Slasher films 3 stars
5/09/10 Tim Lyon This movie is boring as hell, what the hell where they thinking? 1 stars
5/09/10 JC Pierce It gets to be too many 2 stars
5/08/10 "Big Brother" nice interpretation of Freddie's backstory & motivation but lacks dread, Englund scarier 2 stars
5/05/10 Tori Jackie was an awesome Freddy! I also liked how serious it was unlike the original films 4 stars
5/03/10 David A. Good horror film, but Freddy's not the stylish, gleeful, supercool fiend we loved in 1984. 4 stars
5/03/10 bah2501 Um maybe the guy who reviewed this was super brave.. I thought it was the scariest movie!!! 4 stars
5/02/10 Kevin Crane FUCK YOU PLATNUM DUNES the worst of this shitty companies remakes!!!! 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  30-Apr-2010 (R)
  DVD: 05-Oct-2010


  DVD: 05-Oct-2010

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast