More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 11.11%
Worth A Look: 16.67%
Average: 11.11%
Pretty Bad50%
Total Crap: 11.11%

1 review, 12 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Demon Slayer the Movie: Mugen Train by Jay Seaver

In the Heights by Peter Sobczynski

Strawberry Mansion by Jay Seaver

Spirit Untamed by Peter Sobczynski

Amusement Park, The by Peter Sobczynski

Amusement Park, The by Rob Gonsalves

Army of the Dead by Rob Gonsalves

Cruella by alejandroariera

Cruella by Peter Sobczynski

Quiet Place, A: Part II by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

[] Buy posters from this movie
by Scott Weinberg

"SuperDoggie and GooBeast, Part 1! Now with MORE Corey!"
2 stars

It's a good thing for Mr. Dean R. Koontz that he's spent a successful life as a novelist, because his track record in Hollywood is pretty grim across the board. Author of what feels like dozens of read-it-in-three-nights thriller novels, Mr. Koontz has had his works 'appropriated' for cinema several times - and not one is even remotely a good movie.

Although (curiously) Mr. Koontz has never waded into the screenwriting pool, he's clearly not averse to selling his options off to some of the worst filmmakers imaginable. It started in 1977 with Donald Cammell's Demon Seed and Serge Leroy's The Intruder (based on arguably Koontz' best novel, Shattered), resulting in two not-half-bad adaptations.

Flash-forward eleven years. One can only assume that Dean's kids were about to hit college or something equally expensive, because the schlock-meisters got their hands on Koontz' back catalog. First up was Watchers, which was followed by limp adaptations of Whispers, The Face of Fear, The Servants of Twilight, Hideaway and Phantoms. Toss in a few random Watchers sequels, a few languid TV-movies and one GOOD film that Koontz oddly had his name removed from (Tobe Hooper's The Funhouse) and you're looking at a novelist who would be advised to stay as far away from the moviemakers as possible.

All of that so I could tell you this: Watchers pretty much sucks. We're talking about the only film in the history of celleloid that hopes to entice viewers by placing the name of Corey Haim above the title! So after Corey Haim, it's all downhill. And isn't that a scary thought...

Although the movie deviates in many ways from Koontz' novel, the basics are the same: a bloodthirsty beastie and a super-intelligent canine have recently escaped from a secret government laboratory. Both creatures are telepathically linked (or something), which means that while SuperDoggie hits the countryside meeting new friends, his goopy and misshapen cousin follows close behind, leaving a lot of dead bodies in its wake.

I haven't read Watchers in many years, so I'll forgo the comparisons to the movie (except to note that the main character in the book was a grown man and not a whiny-voiced zit-faced Corey like we have in the movie) and state plainly: this is a woefully inept movie in many ways...but mostly in the screenplay department. As in, Watchers is a movie that will have you slapping your head in amazement of the woefully goofball dialogue.

The actors are hardly an improvement. Young Mr. Haim and Barbara Williams (playing perhaps the most witless mother even born) recite their dialogue as if it's written with a lot exclamation points. Michael Ironside does manage to inject several doses of good campy fun with his way over-the-top-and-evil performance as a government agent who will murder people if it helps track down SuperDoggie and GooBeast.

First in a series of four clearly inane Watchers flicks (not surprisingly, all gifts from Roger Corman himself), the original may indeed be the best of the lot (it isn't)...but don't mistake that classification as any sort of real praise. If you're a fan of the C-level low-budget horror material (if only because it gives you something to giggle at), I'd say give the Watchers / Watchers 2 double feature DVD a spot in your Netflix queue.

Watchers and Watchers 2 might be fun-bad, but make no mistake: they're both still pretty damn bad.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 05/18/04 07:29:10
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/15/11 ch a cool horror flick where mutant bigfoot meets old yeller, scary flick! 4 stars
5/22/11 cody corey haim stars in soild sc-fi horror flim with lots thrills and shocks. 4 stars
3/24/11 rapes fun film, not for neu horror fags.. 5 stars
3/18/07 Derek - It's a 3 Star Movie, a 1 Star Review. Scott Weinberg review on Watchers is all flawed! He Did not do any research. 1 stars
4/27/06 Sugarfoot Pretty lame, although Ironside is effective. Also it has nothing to do with the book 2 stars
8/23/05 ES I liked it, evil experiment tries to kill dog and all in contact with said dog, cool 4 stars
6/28/05 lora wish it kept with the book alot more 3 stars
2/02/05 Susie Loved the book but the movies are the worst adaptaions i've ever seen. 1 stars
10/17/04 chris what a good horror movie 5 stars
5/18/04 Jack Sommersby An occasional decent moment, but it's still lamely executed. 2 stars
5/02/04 American Slasher Goddess Watchable, but it is unfaithful to the novel. 3 stars
11/25/02 Charles Tatum Strays from the novel too much 2 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  02-May-1988 (R)



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast