More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
4.07

Awesome51.19%
Worth A Look: 25%
Average: 10.71%
Pretty Bad: 5.95%
Total Crap: 7.14%

1 review, 78 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Gemini Man by Jay Seaver

Pain and Glory by Peter Sobczynski

Rusalka (aka The Siren), The by Jay Seaver

Riot Girls by Rob Gonsalves

Crawl by Rob Gonsalves

Wallflower by Rob Gonsalves

Parts You Lose, The by Jay Seaver

Dilili in Paris by Jay Seaver

First Love by Jay Seaver

Dolemite Is My Name by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Empire of the Sun
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Zarathustra

"Spielberg's most mature and morally complex film"
5 stars

Steven Spielberg's 1987 epic is based on J.G. Ballard's powerful autobiographical novel, itself inspired by his Shanghai childhood and subsequent internment at Lunghua during the Second World War. Though it received mixed reviews and fared indifferently at the box office, Spielberg's adaptation is hypnotic, often mesmerizing cinema, the most inventive and challenging movie of his career.

Christian Bale (now in his mid-twenties and recently seen getting axe-happy in AMERICAN PSYCHO) made his screen debut as Jim Graham (the "J.G." in J.G. Ballard), a pampered British boy living in Shanghai with his mother and wealthy businessman father.

Probably what first attracted Spielberg to Ballard's novel was sentences like these: "Jim had begun to dream of wars. At night the same silent films seemed to flicker against the wall of his bedroom in Amherst Avenue, and transformed his sleeping mind into a deserted newsreel theatre. Fragments of his dreams followed Jim around the city; in the foyers and departmen stores and hotels the images of Dunkirk and Tobruk, Barbarossa and the Rape of Nanking sprang loose from his crowded head."

This excerpt is typical of Ballard's surreal, almost hallucinatory prose, and it demonstrates the difficulty inherent in translating his oneiric narrative into effective cinema. How do you dramatize onscreen a story entirely from the perspective of a child with a hyperactive imagination? Without making the whole experience of war look like one big hallucination? Without making the child himself seem psychotic?

Well, Spielberg doesn't worry about any of that. He just lets his visual imagination run wild, lets the story become more and more surreal, bizarre, fantastic, and removed from "reality" and "naturalism." Until finally we realize that combat IS a surreal experience, war DOES feel like a hallucination, a collective psychosis, and the antitheses of daydream and nightmare, realism and surrealism, cannot truly be distinguished. Particularly when the main character is only 12 years old.

Why did so many critics get upset about the way Spielberg “sentimentalized” war in EMPIRE, yet had nothing but praise for SCHINDLER’S LIST and SAVING PRIVATE RYAN? Both of those films contained more sloppy sentimentality than this, Spielberg’s earlier (and better) examination of World War II and its ramifications. The same people who (wrongly) chastised Spielberg for making war seem “fun” in EMPIRE had no problem with the “fun” action sequences that open and close SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, despite the fact they turn combat into an exhilarating video game (dodge those bullets, folks! duck that explosion!). Even worse is the climax of SCHINDLER’S LIST (the bathetic “I could have done more” speech: historically inaccurate, a distortion of the real Oskar Schindler’s character, and publicly criticized by the author of the book, Thomas Keneally). For that matter, why did so many EMPIRE bashers admire TITANIC, which turns the whole massive tragedy into a convenient backdrop for a cheesy Harlequin romance plot, replete with bonehead dialogue and loads of mindless gunplay?

What EMPIRE’s detractors forget is that the movie is told entirely from the perspective of a cerebral, precocious, but also dreamy, fantasy-prone child. JIM GRAHAM DOES NOT FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING AROUND HIM. Or, put another way, he processes the information almost as a painter or artist would: in terms of loud noises (B-51s, marching regiments, voices in the darkness), vivid images and brilliant primary colors (an exploding Japanese aircraft, a vast billboard of GONE WITH THE WIND, autumn leaves swirling in a swimming pool, the white light of an atom bomb), everything pure sensation. EMPIRE's detractors seem to want the 12-year-old protagonist to process information as a 40-year-old-man would (one possessing middle-of-the-road, middlebrow liberal sympathies). What they deride as emotional immaturity on Spielberg's part is really emotional accuracy.

Jim was already prone to daydreaming before all havoc broke loose, and his childish imagination, as we soon see, is both a blessing and a curse after the invasion of Shanghai. A blessing because it initially shields him from the horror of what is happening. A curse because eventually the horrible truth breaks through his defenses, and he’s too smart and sensitive a child not to be damaged. This is why David Thomson described EMPIRE OF THE SUN as the scariest cinematic depiction of the warping of childhood innocence by experience.

Spielberg’s child-like (not childish) approach is even more appropriate once you know something about the author, J.G. Ballard. Ballard is an acclaimed science fiction writer, but what’s fascinating about his science fiction is that it’s hardly fiction. The recurring motifs of his books—drained swimming pools, humid wildernesses, gleaming aircraft, rotting corpses—seem directly inspired by his childhood in wartime. Yet there is an attraction, an exhilaration latent in Ballard’s descriptions. Ballard has said his experience in a prison camp wasn’t entirely negative, he wasn’t unhappy. Yet Spielberg was chastised for depicting his child hero as frequently quite happy! Surely that was the point. The adult characters (played by John Malkovich, Miranda Richardson, and others) seem quite unhappy, often deeply miserable and despairing. It’s only Jim—PRECISELY BECAUSE HE IS STILL A CHILD—who’s often upbeat and cheerful.

When the Japanese invade Shanghai, Jim flees with his parents, but in the midst of a huge rushing crowd, he drops his toy airplane and drops his mother's hand to pick it up. When he rises to his feet, she is gone. Spielberg draws an extraordinary reaction from Bale here, as fear mounts into panic, and panic dissolves into tearful hysteria. Bale's emotional reaction inadvertently demonstrates how false and stagey most child acting really is.

Jim returns to his house, now silent, empty, devoid of life. The atmosphere of these scenes is difficult to describe, so I'll quote from Ballard again, since Spielberg is so faithful to his source's imagery: "Time had stopped in Amherst Avenue, as motionless as the wall of dust that hung across the rooms, briefly folding around Jim when he walked through the deserted house."

Spielberg manages to suggest the same melancholy, mournful desolation that Ballard does, sometimes even surpassing his source. The director selects the most haunting images from the book, and, if anything, obsesses upon them even more fully than Ballard did.

Images of what? Of footprints in the dust of a bedroom floor, gone with the wind from an open window. A drained swimming pool filled with falling autumn leaves. A silent house littered with scattered dishes and toppled furniture: the home as museum; or Shanghai as modern Pompeii.

Fleeing his abandoned house, Jim is discovered by a pair of American scavengers (John Malkovich and Joe Pantoliano), and "Basie" (Malkovich) quickly becomes his friend and confidante after all three are captured by the Japanese and put into a camp. This is where the movie starts to miss the mark, because Spielberg fails to give the camp the proper horror or resonance. Ballard has said that he was not unhappy in the camp, but Spielberg makes it look like a playground or daycamp for the kids. It just doesn't seem like a bad place to be (at first).

Spielberg regains his momentum in the third act, in the closing scenes of the camp and after the release of the prisoners, who spend the final act of the film wandering like Moses in the wilderness. From this point on, we get a series of surreal images, all beguiling in the conflicting emotions they bring to the surface. Spielberg was wrongly criticized for superficiality here, but this is not a fair assessment. (It's only the prison camp scenes that ring false and silly.)

Christian Bale's depiction of Jim Graham was ignored by most reviewers, but it was acclaimed by the best: Pauline Kael, David Denby, David Thomson, and especially Andrew Sarris, who called it the best performance by a child actor he'd ever seen. This sounds like hyperbole, but it's not: Sarris is merely accurate.
In retrospect, I'm bewildered by the acclaim heaped upon Bale's overexposed contemporary Leonardo DiCaprio, when it's perfectly obvious that what Bale does here (at age 12 or 13) far surpasses anything DiCaprio is capable of projecting. The great thing about Bale's acting in EMPIRE is that he has an invisible technique: he doesn't "perform" in the stagey, artificial manner deployed by most child thesps.

This flawed but fascinating movie is in many ways Spielberg's most personal testament. More unsettling in its implications than Schindler's List, it's also more inventive and more daring than Saving Private Ryan. A triumph of Hollywood grandeur.

link directly to this review at https://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=4334&reviewer=213
originally posted: 05/31/00 19:33:01
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

11/19/16 Anne Some very moving visual effects, yet way too long and just not quite enough there 2 stars
3/14/15 PAUL SHORTT BEAUTIFUL, SOPHISTICATED SAGA 4 stars
1/01/13 amelia this was a great movie, couldn't take my eyes off the screen! 5 stars
10/09/09 Jeff Wilder Spielberg's most underrated film. 4 stars
1/10/09 Anonymous. pretty good and great performance by a young christian bale ;] 4 stars
12/06/08 Allyssa Im doing a project on this movie in school. This movie wasn't too bad. 4 stars
11/26/08 Leo T long...slow...poorly paced 2 stars
6/04/08 LoveLess Had to watch it in school...hated it 1 stars
6/03/08 Elora This film is beautiful, brilliant and poignant. Bale is astonishing as Jim. 5/5 5 stars
4/02/08 Yo Mama It was a peice of shit i dont know why you assholes will even find time to watch it FUCK!!! 1 stars
11/29/07 Cristina I love it ! 5 stars
11/19/07 mb Trippy 3 stars
10/06/07 Jeff Mendillo Mesmerizing, emotional, Spielberg's best in my opinion. 5 stars
10/03/07 mike the best war movie ever made, a surreal approach to a war-torn child's imagination 5 stars
6/15/07 Vincent Ebriega This movie is beyond my expectations. Beutiful movie. 4/5. 4 stars
5/23/07 Ashd it can b boring at times and good at others.not much talking.i did it 4 school 3 stars
4/27/07 megan whoever helped in the production of this film shoudl die!!!!!!!!!! 1 stars
4/08/07 Rachel Lian lol. i had to do a film reflection on this! 4 stars
10/27/06 Bitchflaps Typical Spielberg, the drama is a botched atempt at manufactured emotion... looks nice 2 stars
9/09/06 Captain Craig Never really got off the ground 3 stars
9/07/06 Craig Shit 1 stars
7/24/06 Sepi53 Much better than one could think! 4 stars
7/17/06 mark rare look at the maturation of a child in extraordinary circumstance 5 stars
7/08/06 R.W.Welch Neatly done tho much muttering, accents, Oriental speak make it hard to follow at times. 4 stars
3/01/06 Mike Probably would have been better if i hadnt been studying it at school! 4 stars
12/13/05 ! This a pretty good movie (i had to watch it at school) 4 stars
8/13/05 ES mmm...nothing says tasty like eating weevils 3 stars
6/01/05 Artur Hollander nat a good movie 3 stars
4/16/05 Ryan Amazing. 5 stars
2/24/05 Ronel very nice movie 5 stars
2/04/05 Gray weird 3 stars
2/02/05 ralph a true movie expert 32 yrs old well done but boring at times 3 stars
12/14/04 Dan good vivid movie 4 stars
11/05/04 J bird a moving masterpiece 5 stars
10/31/04 RANIA an incredibly awesome movie! 5 stars
10/22/04 Kim Boring! 2 stars
9/15/04 Andrea Richly profound: Brilliantly acted and written, beautifully directed. My fave Spielberg 5 stars
5/12/04 A> L> Lyons Super 5 stars
4/29/04 Kate This was an incredibly emotional, powerful movie. Christian Bale is beyond perfect! 5 stars
12/07/03 john the dramatic intention seems a bit murky but it's powerful - 5 stars
10/09/03 JimmyC Excellent Movie 5 stars
5/18/03 George Jung Great story and crap direction left this movie flat on its back. 3 stars
5/05/03 ZULUU MAN IT WAS SHIT!!!! 1 stars
10/28/02 nelliah it was a great film. 5 stars
9/12/02 Edna B. Excellent acting by Bale and unforgettable images from Spielberg make an exceptional movie. 5 stars
6/25/02 Charles Tatum Long but good 4 stars
4/22/02 Don Only US-made WWII movie that depicts the Japanese military with empathy--they are brave too 4 stars
2/06/02 Jacole Makes you apppreciate what you have 5 stars
11/29/01 Gail Henderson I love this movie - every scene is riveting and Christian Bale is fantastic! 5 stars
11/16/01 Joe Genne Magnificent 5 stars
11/02/01 Timmay! It wasn't bad, but I found it long and sometimes boring. 3 stars
9/27/01 Jancie I LOVE IT! 5 stars
8/19/01 John Shelton I feel "Empire of the Sun" is Spieberg's best work. 5 stars
8/06/01 E-Funk I liked it even more when I found out the little runt was Christian Bale. 4 stars
6/07/01 roberta gorgeous! 5 stars
5/30/01 Cadillac of the Sky! Loved it. 5 stars
5/28/01 jim unforgetable 5 stars
4/19/01 Maria J the best film I've seen in a long time 5 stars
4/19/01 Matthew Bartley Fantastic visuals but the narrative needs tightening. 4 stars
3/27/01 ChrisHawthorn I have never seen a movie with a more annoying main character 1 stars
3/23/01 rexfung MUST SEE THIS MOVIE 5 stars
3/19/01 Lindsay this is my all-time favorite film :) 5 stars
1/21/01 Allan Wilson an emotional seesaw 5 stars
1/14/01 Nathaly Salazar Very good, a moving film 5 stars
12/05/00 TA Thompson a worthwhile but quiet film in many ways. best thing christian bale has done. 4 stars
11/28/00 Sarah A beautiful film, one of the greatest about war of all time. 5 stars
11/28/00 Cristopher Revilla good movie, but could've been better cause the idea was great 4 stars
11/20/00 Evnike Wonderful exploration of horrors of war through a 12 yr old's perspective. Haunting music 5 stars
11/14/00 The EVIL Penguin a little boring; one of Spielberg's worst works 2 stars
10/28/00 chicoles Having lived through WWII in the U.S., and the same age as the film's Jim, it rang true. 5 stars
10/22/00 Daniel Morguenstern Empire of the Sun is an excellent Spielberg movie 5 stars
10/11/00 Shona Peters absolutely amazing!!! and christian bale shows his true incredible acting talent. 5 stars
9/28/00 nathan the scene where jim sang the welsh lullaby to thekamikaze pilots was heartbreaking 5 stars
7/05/00 Steve Zarathustra's brilliant review confirms what many critics missed: It's Jim's perspective. 5 stars
5/13/00 Mark Was OK ... but could it have been a little loooonger?? 4 stars
5/02/00 lucas jackson not a spielberg great, but good 4 stars
4/28/00 JDC Interesting "society is just a pleasant illusion" kind of theme. I enjoyed it. 4 stars
4/15/00 ChiefAlDog Beautiful film. The little kid is solid. "Cadillac of the sky!" 4 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  01-Dec-1987 (PG)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast