|
Advertisement |
Overall Rating
 Awesome: 34.09%
Worth A Look: 49.24%
Average: 12.88%
Pretty Bad: 0.76%
Total Crap: 3.03%
11 reviews, 66 user ratings
|
|
| Best in Show |
by Thom
"Sassy, sexy fun."
|
Christopher Guest's movies are all character studies. Best In Show is set against a Dog Show and it plays like a method acting workshop. Premise: How would this particular character behave in this situation with this particular motivation. What would they feel? Roll Cameras.Christopher Guest does it again. First there was Spinal Tap, the heavy metal band parody. Then there was Waiting For Guffman about a small community theatre production that was something like a populist Waiting for Godot. And now there is Best In Show.
Sure its about a Dog Show, but its really about the people who find meaning through their participation in the world of dog shows and how it affects their life. The dogs are their life. Dogs, like careers, like significant others, like cars, like collecting ... its all the same mechanism really. I'm pretty sure Guest takes a constructivist view of the situation. "How is this scenario built and how are the people/places/things/events as universal as they are particular?" Guest is a pretty smart guy. And when its all said and done, its just a funny movie with some good laughs and some rough spots that don't come off as well.
The scene where Parker Posey and Michael Hitchcock as the yuppie couple Peg and Hamilton Swan talk about how they met is all improvised and there are moments when Parker just can't keep a straight face. I liked that genuineness, that thespian-ness of the film. A good ensemble piece for actors allows actors to act. Not to be stars. I like that a lot. Not that being a star is bad. but acting is cool and its cool to see artists doing their art.
One other element that I was totally blown away by was the slight whistling affectation in the speech of Guest's character, Harlan Pepper. Guest must have been on some kind of a vocalisation kick because his character was also practicing to be a ventriloquist. I wonder if patterns of speech are the current character obsession for Guest. I'm sure it wasn't a random element, but a carefully studied and placed element. Its those little things that bring characters to life in a way that you can't do on a stage. You can't be subtle on stage. You can't edit for subtlety after the principal footage has been shot.
But who cares about the stage. Its just the Waiting For Godot connection I was trying to reckon with the reason why Guest uses traditional stage themes in the context of film which, while it employs light and sound and motion, is an entirely different beast for actors and directors and yet one which emerges time and time again as a reference point for actors who are acting but not for film makers, who are film making.
I saw Best In Show the night it opened at a small theatre in a college town, so the crowd was a little more urbane, a little more mired in terms like "constructivist" and playwrights like Samuel Becket and a wide range of ages. The second day at the same theatre, I noticed there were many lesbians in line for the matinee. I guess it became a lesbian community must see film literally overnight. I think lesbians feel obligated to support the work of anyone who features lesbianism in a non-patriarchal way. Or maybe it was just one of those flukes and my data is all skewed because of it.
Almost all the cast of Waiting for Guffman returned for Best In Show. Catherine O'Hara, Parker Posey, Christoper Guest ... and the rest, recreate all new roles, flaunting their ability to flow like water in and out of these characters but still being ironical and absurd in a way that doesn't make the characters less human, just more caricaturish. The characters are mostly studies in a type.. the shallow yuppie, the flamboyant homosexual, the slutty suburban housewife ... who is actually pretty grounded and comfortable with her sexuality.
There are a lot of wrenches like this in Best In Show.. You think you are going to see a send up of a stereotype and you end up getting a complicated human. The dog show is the thing that brings everyone together. Its like a level playing field for people who come from different places with different problems, different priveleges, different needs and in a way they all end up being essentially the same kind of person. A Dog Show-er. I wasn't sure when the film was supposed to be a parody. There were some kitschy elements in it, but it wasn't like a Leslie Neilson film were the characters are clownish in their simplicity. Something seperates Guests movies from just parody.It seems like his method is to take the simple, driving themes of anyones life and wrap them into a fairly commonplace situation as a study in humanity while pointing out how universal much of the human experience is and yet we just get all bogged down with the very surface details. At that level of living, it gets pretty funny. and where we also get drama, conflict and all the wonderful stories about us and our lives.
link directly to this review at https://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=4475&reviewer=67
originally posted: 10/10/00 17:50:23
![[printer]](/images/icon/printer.gif) printer-friendly format
|
 |
USA
13-Oct-2000 (PG-13)
UK
N/A
Australia
12-Apr-2001 (M)
|
|
Articles 
subscribe to this feed![[AllPosters.com]](/images/icon/ap.gif){kind=icon}
