More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
1.71

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average: 11.76%
Pretty Bad47.06%
Total Crap: 41.18%

2 reviews, 5 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Kingmaker, The by Jay Seaver

Doctor Sleep by Jay Seaver

Ford v Ferrari by Peter Sobczynski

Marriage Story by Peter Sobczynski

Better Days by Jay Seaver

Scandalous: The True Story of the National Enquirer by Rob Gonsalves

Paradise Hills by Rob Gonsalves

3 from Hell by Rob Gonsalves

Dolemite Is My Name by Rob Gonsalves

My Dear Liar by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Perfume
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Chris Parry

"It's an easy oneliner - but this is a stinker."
1 stars

A film every bit as self-indulgent as the industry it seeks to portray, Perfume is a bottomless pit of cameo appearances, long boring scenes and characters that go absolutely nowhere. Generally a reviewer will offer up some kind of synopsis of a film when they analyse it in print, but with Perfume, that's nearly impossible. Just as James Toback's Black and White was a meandering trip to nowhere, so too is this pompous mess - only Perfume doesn't have the message behind it that Toback might claim was prevalent in his work.

In fact, it's hard to say what exactly was going on here. If it was a satire on the fashion industry, where was the satire? If it was a portrait of the fashion industry, where was the realism? If it was T&A, where was the T&A?

Rather than show any insight into anything at all, Perfume seems to be an 'actor payback' - as if someone has called in some favours and had a series of celebs fill in some cameos on a very underdone script (in fact, there was no script). Carmen Electra is on screen for all of about three lines, Kyle MacLachlan ditto, in the end you don't have a clue why most of these people were even shown to begin with.

The performances are sound enough, especially when you take into account that everything was improvised, but why should we be expected to pay eight bucks to watch what amounts to an actors experiment? Mike Figgis' Timecode was improvised, but it also featured a four-way split screen from start to finish.

If you're gonna go experimental, you might as well go all the way. Perfume goes nowhere near all the way, in fact it barely gets out of the blocks. It's rubbish, and I mean that in the nastiest way.

link directly to this review at https://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=4876&reviewer=1
originally posted: 01/26/01 19:11:55
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

5/25/06 Lola Aerdon Absolutely horrible...who is Joanne Baron? 1 stars
7/29/04 Shalethia Middleton Pretty Good 3 stars
5/11/02 Veronica Foxx -The Raven-Haired Temptress Painfully clear it was improvised, amateurishly too. Played out like H.S. drama project. 2 stars
3/25/02 Gayle Wohlken Sound was terrible --echoey with lots of people talking at once -- boring because of it -- 2 stars
3/07/01 Adryenn Ashley Some fabulous performances by Joanne Baron and Paul Sorvino. 3 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  26-Jan-2001

UK
  N/A

Australia
  02-Feb-2001




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast