More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 16.22%
Worth A Look37.84%
Average: 35.14%
Pretty Bad: 5.41%
Total Crap: 5.41%

2 reviews, 25 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Koko-di Koko-da by Jay Seaver

Shirley by Peter Sobczynski

Dreamland (2019) by Peter Sobczynski

Lucky Grandma by Jay Seaver

Vast of Night, The by Peter Sobczynski

High Note, The by Peter Sobczynski

Taking of Tiger Mountain, The by Jay Seaver

Trip to Greece, The by Peter Sobczynski

Night God by Jay Seaver

Alice (2019) by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Shipping News, The
[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"In newspaper terms, 'Shipping News' buries its lead and ignores the issues."
3 stars

Director Lasse Hallstrom's last two films, "The Cider House Rules" and "Chocolat," were glossy, pretty-looking pictures about gentle people with gentle souls. "The Shipping News" is no different in that respect.

It also perpetuates Hallstrom's tendency to treat emotionally huge issues in a very non-huge way. "Cider House Rules" had abortion, "Chocolat" had spousal abuse (one frying pan to the head, and the problem is solved!), and now "Shipping News" has a brief flashback in which we learn someone was the victim of incest rape at age 12, and that it resulted in a pregnancy. But it's all better now, and we need never mention it again!

(There's also exactly one reference to a child having been sold to a black-market adoption agency. One line, nothing more.)

Maybe Hallstrom is just choosing the wrong books to base his movies on, and maybe his current screenwriter of choice, Robert Nelson Jacobs (who also adapted "Chocolat"), lacks the discernment to know which plot points to keep and which ones to cut because he can't devote full attention to them. I haven't read the book "The Shipping News" is based on, but I suspect the incest-rape thing is given more gravity there than it is here.

Thematically, it's a relatively important point. Everyone in this movie has a past that haunts them, and everyone has to overcome those obstacles to build a better future. The protagonist, an unambitious New England native named Quoyle (Kevin Spacey), fell in love with the wrong woman, fathered a child, and now finds himself in the tiny Newfoundland town that his "people" came from.

There he meets a whole host of quirky, funny small-town people, including Wavey (Julianne Moore), who has a mildly retarded little boy and no husband to speak of. There's also Quoyle's aunt Agnis (Judi Dench), who dragged him here in the first place and who has a number of personal issues to deal with, not the least of which is a penchant for stealing people's ashes. Oh, and every single townsperson has some trouble in his past, many of these centering around boats and drownings, which are prevalent in the wintery fishing-centered community.

Family is important to the movie. Quoyle is never given a first name, presumably because, as the locals suppose, he is a Quoyle, nothing more or less. Family can also be the greatest source of our problems, though, as is also noted in the film.

(Side note: Have you always wanted to see Dame Judi Dench squatting on an outhouse toilet, taking a tinkle? Then run, don't walk, to see "The Shipping News"!!!!!!)

The movie begins brusquely, thanks primarily to Cate Blanchett as the crass, flighty woman Quoyle has an affair with. Once she's out of the picture, it's remarkably uncynical, and altogether pleasant. Which is sort of the problem: Some of the elements should be a lot more unpleasant than they are. Aside from being more fair and mature that way, it would also give the film some weight. As it is, it has very little resonance.

Kevin Spacey is characteristically excellent as Quoyle, supported ably by Julianne Moore and Judi Dench, as well as Scott Glenn, Rhys Ifans and Pete Postlethwaite as his co-workers at the tiny newspaper he writes for. No, there's nothing wrong with the performances here. It's the whitewashed writing and superficial directing that keep this decent movie from being a truly great one.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 12/22/01 08:51:15
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

3/01/10 Phil M. Aficiando Put me to sleep, though it's a handsome film; maybe it's me not engaging with the storyith 3 stars
6/28/09 the dork knight Quirky, unpredictable, but ultimately dull and pointless. 2 stars
5/08/05 Bluto Great cast, Blanchett is so hot 4 stars
8/23/04 R.W. Welch Not much electricity here. I presume the book was better. 3 stars
1/31/04 john godrich atmospheric, good character definition, poor ending 4 stars
10/04/03 Joesco Snspshots only from a unique book - Read it 3 stars
5/17/03 George Jung Great film. The directing is near flawless. 5 stars
4/01/03 Jack Sommersby Formulaic stuff, yet it manages to work. Flawlessly acted. 4 stars
1/02/03 Sam Potter Great cast. I love the book, but don't know if it's really movie material. A unique film. 4 stars
12/22/02 Bluto Cate was great as a slut 4 stars
10/12/02 othree actually pretty good when you can get over the past meets future and yarn 4 stars
7/14/02 bob leather jacket some moments were shocking and even gross 3 stars
6/22/02 Doc Shock Loser attempts to get a life story.... boring 2 stars
6/20/02 J I'm pretty much with Eric on this one. It makes a decent rental. 3 stars
4/29/02 Walter Anheier Wonderfull Pictures, Gripping story 5 stars
4/14/02 Newfoundlander not Newfie What a discrace 1 stars
3/07/02 Jack Hunter a weak hero, bleak environment, OK for Newfie visitors 3 stars
2/22/02 Bitchslap Deleting ratings to get your fav. movies to have high marks goes against what u stand for 1 stars
1/19/02 CoffeeVixen the cast is nothing but pure beauty, worth every penny to see 5 stars
1/16/02 Allison beauty in contrast to pain, both past and present - the beauty wins 5 stars
1/16/02 Dorothy Meyering Compliments the novel; superior acting 4 stars
1/11/02 Giovanni Kevin Spacey Rocks! 5 stars
12/28/01 Sus Petersen good acting...but script was lacking..some funny bits..characters not fully developed 4 stars
12/25/01 John Wonderful acting, script,a nd direction.. every bit as good as Cider House Rules! 5 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  18-Jan-2002 (PG-13)



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast