More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 8.33%
Worth A Look: 29.17%
Pretty Bad: 16.67%
Total Crap: 12.5%

2 reviews, 12 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Tiger of Eschnapur, The by Jay Seaver

Indian Tomb, The by Jay Seaver

Bride with White Hair, The by Jay Seaver

Bride with White Hair 2, The by Jay Seaver

15 Minutes of War (L'Intervention) by Jay Seaver

Bacurau by Jay Seaver

Whistlers, The by Jay Seaver

Fly Me to the Saitama by Jay Seaver

Fantastic Fungi by Jay Seaver

Ode to Nothing by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Sports betting should be more entertaining than this."
3 stars

SCREENED AT THE 2003 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL: “Bookies” has an interesting premise that it allows to languish from underuse. Rather than mining comedy or drama from it, the film throws its idea onto the screen and then shuffles away.

The idea is that three college guys -- smart, handsome Toby (Nick Stahl), computer-nerdy Casey (Lukas Haas) and irrational hothead Jude (Johnny Galecki) -- have lost $1,000 in a massive bet on college sports. It occurs to them that the only ones making money on gambling are the bookies, who take a 10 percent “vig,” or service charge, on every bet. Ergo, it seems advantageous to become bookies themselves.

Now, no one can know who the bookies are, of course, or they’ll be at best turned in to the cops and at worst beaten and robbed by fellow students. Jude works at the campus library, though, and he hits on a genius system. Each bettor is told a specific book in which to place his money, and another specific book from which to collect his winnings, if any. Naturally, Jude selects only books that are never checked out, lest the cash fall into the wrong hands. Since the gamblers assume they’re dealing with high-level bookies, they never think of just not paying up.

The system is fraught with peril, yet aside from one incident whose significance is largely ignored, it does not result in any grand mishaps. It works pretty well, in fact, and the trio of students become wealthy. Casey wants new computers, Toby wants to woo a pretty sports-medicine student (Rachael Leigh Cook), and Jude starts doing drugs. They also run afoul of the local Mafia, which already had a nice gambling ring going, thank you very much.

The film was directed by Mark Illsley, whose debut, “Happy, Texas” (1999), had all the whimsy and humor that this film lacks. It has brief moments of fun, and some minor skirmishes with high drama. But for the most part, it is content merely to tell its story, the plot of which is nothing different, unusual or special. This is an uncompelling movie.

What’s curious about it is the way it deals with the moral aspects of the boys’ scheme. To raise the initial capital necessary to start a gambling operation, Toby takes out an emergency student loan. If gambling isn’t already somewhat questionable in your system of morals, here’s something that surely is. And yet, the film ignores such questions. Early on, I assumed there were two ways it could go. Either it would all come crashing down and it would turn out to be a cautionary tale, or else they’d get away with it and the film would revel in the immorality of its characters. Little did I suspect a third possibility: that the film would pretend the moral questions don’t even exist.

My problem with the film, then, is that without those issues, what’s the point? Did they characters learn anything? Did they NOT learn anything? The movie acts like learning isn’t even one of the things movie characters are expected to do, which seems pretty obtuse.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 01/27/03 17:40:24
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2003 Sundance Film Festival. For more in the 2003 Sundance Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

9/02/07 S00t Hi, good morning to all of you...I like it and the background and colors make it easy to re 4 stars
5/27/07 zyrtec vicodin online 2 stars
11/12/05 Larry Dosser lacks tension 3 stars
10/30/04 Corky Much ado about very little 2 stars
9/17/04 Janet R. Too bad Illsley screwed up Bacall's original screenplay 3 stars
4/12/04 Paul Greensatone I liked it a lot. Great story with great actors and very well edited. 5 stars
5/06/03 Ralph R. Clemente pretty humble 2 stars
2/21/03 Elliot Schwartz I didn't like it. Vapid "entertainment" 1 stars
2/04/03 Andrew Goldfarb Didn't care for it. Found it pointless. 1 stars
2/02/03 Tony Ferullo A good topic done VERY poorly 1 stars
1/31/03 Catherine Glow It's really awesome and the actors are really really great 5 stars
1/30/03 Dennis Harvey - Variety Lucas Haas, Nick Stahl and Johnny Galecki star as financially ambitious 2 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  07-Sep-2004 (R)
  DVD: 07-Sep-2004



Directed by
  Mark Illsley

Written by
  Michael Bacall

  Nick Stahl
  Lukas Haas
  Johnny Galecki
  Rachael Leigh Cook
  David Proval
  John Diehl

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast