More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Worth A Look: 25%
Average: 14.58%
Pretty Bad: 12.5%
Total Crap: 8.33%

2 reviews, 36 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Star Wars Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker by Jay Seaver

Force of Nature by Rob Gonsalves

Greyhound by Rob Gonsalves

Undercover Vice: Strapped for Danger Part II by Rob Gonsalves

Painted Bird, The by Rob Gonsalves

Relativity by Jay Seaver

Amulet by Jay Seaver

Secret, The: Dare to Dream by Peter Sobczynski

She Dies Tomorrow by Peter Sobczynski

Yes, God, Yes by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Jay Seaver

"Nice to have, but I'll still watch the theatrical cut in the future."
4 stars

As glad as I am to have seen Richard Kelly's new/old cut of Donnie Darko, I don't see myself retiring my current DVD anytime soon. Though the director's cut fills in some of the gaps, it does so at a cost.

A little Internet archeology allows me to locate what I wrote about the original cut on 28 January 2002, when I caught one of the eight screenings it had in Cambridge before running midnights at the Coolidge for something like a year:


Ironically, when Donnie Darko screened at Sundance last year, it was pegged as "not indie enough", with its digital effects and high-profile actors like Drew Barrymore, Noah Wylie, Patrick Swayze, etc. I guess that's how it fell through the cracks - too expensive for the likes of Lion's Gate, too offbeat for the majors - and wound up with Newmarket, the company created to distribute Memento, though they haven't done as well getting Darko into theaters.

Which is too bad, because it's worth seeing. Jake Gyllenhaal gives a great performance as the title character, and writer/director Richard Kelly bears watching after this debut.

The first thing you'll notice is that this movie is funny. Explosively funny. A dinner-table argument that starts between Donnie's older sister Elizabeth (Jake's real-life sister Maggie) and their parents over the upcoming 1988 election somehow shifts to Elizabeth and Donnie, quickly getting personal and profane. The director has this fall into a good rhythm, and always keeps 10-year-old sister Samantha just in frame, and allows just the right amount of time to pass before having her innocently ask "what's a f***mouth?" That kind of comic timing, use of reaction shots and gleeful vulgarity runs throughout the movie - check the look on Darko Sr.'s face after finding out what Donnie said to his gym teacher and under what circumstances, or how Donnie corrects his friends' mistaken beliefs vis-a-vis Smurf orgies. That doesn't even include the bizarre Halloween double feature at the local theater, or the mileage gotten from the phrase "kiddie porn dungeon".

What gives the humor its edge, though, is how worrisome some of it is coming from Donnie; the boy is not well in the head. He's seeing a therapist and on medication, but despite that still sleepwalks and has begun to hallucinate a demonic six-foot bunny named Frank. When Donnie lashes out, no matter how deserving the target or how funny the result, there's the unnerving sense that someone could get hurt.

It's the science-fictional elements that really elevate this film into the realm of the strange and may ultimately prove to be its undoing. Donnie escapes death in the beginning because his sleepwalking (at Frank's behest) results in his being out of his room when a jet engine falls through the roof. Over the course of the rest of the film, Donnie becomes obsessed with time travel, and while this provides one of the film's most intriguing visuals (Abyss-style FX are used to show people as four-dimensional events in spacetime), it ultimately undermines the story, shifting attention away from Donnie's mental problems to a more gimmicky paradox story. Or not. Like Happy Accidents, the director doesn't tip his hand to what's real and what's delusional; unforunately, Happy Accidents has a much stronger finish; I don't think Darko ever really suggests a satisfying way for its puzzle pieces to fit together.


The unfortunate thing about the director's cut is that it tends to emphasize the science-fictional elements even more. While it's nice that writer/director Richard Kelly has worked out a whole mythology for how the time-travel elements in this movie work, that mythology seems very arbitrary, too obviously created specifically to describe this movie. I'm also not sure what to make of Donnie's "visions", which are mostly new and are somewhat meta-amusing for how they look like genuine 1980s sequences.

The tone of the movie has also shifted; I don't recall quite so much ominious underscore in the original cut - at some point, I'm going to have to break out the DVD and see whether I'm remembering some things correctly. I don't recall the student assembly scene being quite so sinister as it is here, for example. The increased emphasis on the time travel makes Donnie a less compelling character. Where before, Donnie Darko was something of a wild card - he may be just crazy, or he may be part of some paradox, and at times we as the audience just didn't know what was going on in his head, making him unpredictable - here he seems to more obviously be fate's tool, and less active a participant.

The changes aren't all bad - we do get a few more scenes with the Darko parents (I had forgotten how much I loved Holmes Osborne and Mary McDonnell in this movie), and Drew Barrymore's character is fleshed out a little more. Underneath the sci-fi stuff, which is shoveled on even more in this edition, the bits about Donnie and his family and friends are still gold.

I'm glad to see this cut available, and to have seen it once. It doesn't replace the original theatrical cut for me, but the extra information is now in my brain to be called upon whenever I watch the old version.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 09/11/04 16:59:10
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

2/21/17 morris campbell the original cuts better 3 stars
6/22/09 Simon That a director's cut like this even exists speaks volumes to the film's innate shittiness 1 stars
4/17/08 Quigley Bizarre, creepy and hard to follow. Original cut is probably better. 3 stars
12/22/05 ALDO Butterfly effect (cinema ending) is way better. this movie felt unfinished 3 stars
11/08/05 Jim Good, but not as good as the original version. Spells things out a bit too clearly. 4 stars
8/31/05 Digital Darko Surealism is something some can't apprecaite, this is great for those who can, possibility! 5 stars
7/25/05 Eric Rollins Like the Thing in the Jar exhibit, not really sure what to make of it. 3 stars
5/22/05 Cham An instant cult classic. 4 stars
5/10/05 Carol ok 3 stars
5/01/05 Paul Shawver depressing 3 stars
4/28/05 Colleen Godlrick quirky 4 stars
3/04/05 Jon Smith sucks! 1 stars
3/03/05 Laurie Le Blanc I liked the original better. 4 stars
2/01/05 Wendy S. A must see! 5 stars
1/17/05 Jeff Anderson THIS IS TIME TRAVEL AT ITS BEST! J. Gyllenhaal is a marvel and Michael Andrews' score ROCKS 5 stars
11/23/04 alien assassin Surrealism at it's best !!! 5 stars
11/12/04 a. Joe b It is awesome 5 stars
10/28/04 john shit 1 stars
9/24/04 Al Guy Sometimes not knowing is good. 3 stars
9/17/04 Kyle Wellcome One of my favorite films. definatly an awsome one. 5 stars
9/08/04 Jane M Absolutely my favourite film for years, really gets you thinking.... and Jake Gyllywotsit's 5 stars
9/07/04 emmy it was awsome jake was hot in it 5 stars
8/29/04 kryptKnight Prefered the cut version, I got to have my own theories. Directors intended strory gay IMHO 4 stars
8/27/04 M A journey well worth every minute!! 5 stars
8/25/04 Simmone Penhaligoon Surreal and frankly very trippy. 5 stars
8/24/04 Randy Great movie 5 stars
8/16/04 Dallas Moye Excellent 5 stars
8/15/04 Anthony G hey "mike", he didnt spell anything wrong, he just has bad grammer you fucking stupid jew 5 stars
8/15/04 Boris Hey "mike" did you know that proper nouns are capitalized you retarded worthless fool 5 stars
8/05/04 Mix Master Mason Slightly improved version of a mediocre film. Worth seeing. 4 stars
7/27/04 Cliftronic Excellent additions to the story 5 stars
7/25/04 mike "Best movie I've ever watch"....Learn how to spell. 1 stars
7/24/04 Steve Holcomb I loved this movie 5 stars
6/14/04 Jorge Best movie I've ever watch 5 stars
6/06/04 kevin directors cut was kind of akward...but some interesting new stuff 5 stars
6/05/04 David Love it! One of my favourite films... 5 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  23-Jul-2004 (R)
  DVD: 15-Feb-2005



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast